Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30707281›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2019

Validation and Reliability of the French Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire.

Nicolas Audag, Christophe Goubau, Etienne Danse, Laure Vandervelde, Giuseppe Liistro, Michel Toussaint, Gregory Reychler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04465903 (Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04465903 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ-T)

TypeobservationalSponsorProf. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital OrganizationRan2020 to 2020Enrolled170ConditionsDysphagia, Oropharyngeal, Swallowing Disorder, ValidationArmsTurkish Version of Sydney Swallow Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of a Dutch Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Assessing Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Severity in Dutch-Speaking Populations.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic utility of different dysphagia screening tools to detect dysphagia in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas AudagInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. nicolas.audag@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0002-8352-4138
Christophe GoubauUnité de Pneumologie pédiatrique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Etienne DanseService de Radiologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Laure VanderveldeHaute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, PARNASSE-ISEI, Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe LiistroService de Pneumologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Michel ToussaintInkendaal Rehabilitation Hospital, Vlezenbeek, Belgium.
Gregory ReychlerInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is frequently under-reported and early detection may lead to adapt strategies of rehabilitation and management decisions. The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ), a self-reported questionnaire for the detection and quantification of oropharyngeal dysphagia, was previously adapted and validated in other languages but not in French. The purposes of this study were to develop and validate a French version of SSQ (SSQ-f) and to assess its psychometric properties. This SSQ-f, obtained by back-translation and cross-cultural adaptation, was validated in 27 patients with impaired swallowing and 27 healthy controls. After inclusion, patients filled in the SSQ-f and performed a videofluoroscopic swallow study. The penetration aspiration scale (PAS) and Dysphagia outcome and severity scale (DOSS) were assigned to assess construct validity. Sensitivity and specificity of cut-off scores for the SSQ-f were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Moreover, the SSQ-f was repeated after 2 weeks to evaluate its test-retest reliability. The results supported that SSQ-f was considered understandable. Its total score was strongly correlated to the DOSS (r = - 0.873) and to the PAS (r = 0.738). It demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.744 to 0.956. The test-retest reliability was excellent. According to the ROC curve, cut-off scores of 118.5 or 218.5 were proposed for determining oropharyngeal dysphagia using DOSS as a reference and 755.0, using PAS as reference. No ceiling or floor effects were observed. In conclusion, the SSQ-f is a valid and reliable instrument to measure and detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in French-speaking subjects and can be used in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

CultureDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingAssessmentdeglutition disordersFrench translationSwallowingSydney Swallow QuestionnaireValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.