Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30707250›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2019

Diagnostic Effect of the Single BP Cut-Offs for Identifying Elevated BP and Hypertension in Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years.

Qin Liu, Yaping Hou, Liu Yang, Min Zhao, Shengxu Li, Bo Xi

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qin LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Children's Hospital of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Yaping HouDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Liu YangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shengxu LiChildren's Minnesota Research Institute, Children's Hospitals and Clinics, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bo XiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China. xibo2010@sdu.edu.cn.
Shandong University · CNChildren's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics · CNChildren’s Minnesota - St. Paul Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the percentile-based definitions of elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension for children and adolescents of all ages in the 2004 fourth report, the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) BP guideline recommends a change to single BP cut-offs for clinical diagnosis (120/< 80-129/< 80 mmHg for elevated BP and ≥ 130/80 mmHg for hypertension) in adolescents aged 13 years and older, and it also recommends researchers using the percentile-based definitions for more precise BP classification. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic effect of the single BP cut-offs for identifying adolescent abnormal BP as compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table by sex, age, and height. Data were from 8287 adolescents aged 13-17 years in NHANES 1999-2016 and 1659 adolescents aged 13-17 years in NHANES III (1988-1994). Compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table, the single BP thresholds performed well for identifying elevated BP in adolescents in NHANES 1999-2016/NHANES III, with high values of area under the curve 0.93/0.95, sensitivity 86.7%/89.9%, specificity 100%/100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%/100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.2%/98.8%, and kappa coefficient 0.92/0.94. The results were similar for identifying hypertension in the two datasets, with especially high PPV 100%/100% and NPV 99.2%/99.2%. However, the sensitivity values of the simple method for identifying hypertension were not satisfactory among girls, younger adolescents, and Hispanic adolescents in both datasets. In conclusion, the single BP cut-offs in general performed similarly well for identifying abnormal BP as compared to 2017 AAP percentile table, but not well in some subgroups.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAdolescentAge FactorsBlood Pressure DeterminationBody HeightCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleNutrition SurveysPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsSex FactorsUnited StatesAdolescentsDiagnosisHigh blood pressureSimple method

Identifiers

PMID30707250
OpenAlexW2914943713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.