Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30707242›Full record

ReviewHNO2019

[Models of tinnitus development : From cochlea to cortex].

P Krauss, A Schilling, K Tziridis, H Schulze

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Estimation of Tinnitus-Related Socioeconomic Costs in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P KraussExperimentelle HNO-Heilkunde, Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
A SchillingExperimentelle HNO-Heilkunde, Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
K TziridisExperimentelle HNO-Heilkunde, Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
H SchulzeExperimentelle HNO-Heilkunde, Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. Holger.Schulze@uk-erlangen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of subjective tinnitus is still not mechanistically understood and existing models are controversially discussed. In this overview, the authors discuss three of the main models, all of which propose damage to the cochlea as the initial step in tinnitus development. Based on these models, a possible manifestation of tinnitus-related neuronal activity at the perceptually relevant level of the auditory pathway, the auditory cortex, is presented. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that one of the models offers a new view on the phenomenon, which could potentially help patients to better cope with their condition.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexTinnitusAuditory PathwaysCochleaHumansAnimal modelsAuditory thresholdComputer simulationHearing disordersPerception

Identifiers

PMID30707242
OpenAlexW2913107034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.