Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30707106›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2019

Supporting Older Adults in Exercising With a Tablet: A Usability Study.

Sumit Mehra, Bart Visser, Nazli Cila, Jantine van den Helder, Raoul Hh Engelbert, Peter Jm Weijs, Ben Ja Kröse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Successful Aging for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Experimental Study with a Tablet App.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sumit MehraApplied Psychology, Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and Law, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8996-1956
Bart VisserAmsterdam Centre for Innovative Health Practice, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-9715
Nazli CilaCREATE-IT Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Digital Media and Creative Industries, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-3563
Jantine van den HelderAmsterdam Centre for Innovative Health Practice, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3071-7251
Raoul Hh EngelbertAmsterdam Centre for Innovative Health Practice, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6923-8696
Peter Jm WeijsFaculty of Sports and Nutrition, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-0426
Ben Ja KröseCREATE-IT Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Digital Media and Creative Industries, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-0618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor older adults, physical activity is vital for maintaining their health and ability to live independently. Home-based programs can help them achieve the recommended exercise frequency. An application for a tablet computer was developed to support older adults in following a personal training program. It featured goal setting, tailoring, progress tracking, and remote feedback.

objectiveIn line with the Medical Research Council Framework, which prescribes thorough testing before evaluating the efficacy with a randomized controlled trial, the aim of this study was to assess the usability of a tablet-based app that was designed to support older adults in doing exercises at home.

methodsA total of 15 older adults, age ranging from 69 to 99 years old, participated in a usability study that utilized a mixed-methods approach. In a laboratory setting, novice users were asked to complete a series of tasks while verbalizing their ongoing thoughts. The tasks ranged from looking up information about exercises and executing them to tailoring a weekly exercise schedule. Performance errors and time-on-task were calculated as proxies of effective and efficient usage. Overall satisfaction was assessed with a posttest interview. All responses were analyzed independently by 2 researchers.

resultsThe participants spent 13-85 seconds time-on-task. Moreover, 79% (11/14)-100% (14/14) participants completed the basic tasks with either no help or after having received 1 hint. For expert tasks, they needed a few more hints. During the posttest interview, the participants made 3 times more positive remarks about the app than negative remarks.

conclusionsThe app that was developed to support older adults in doing exercises at home is usable by the target audience. First-time users were able to perform basic tasks in an effective and efficient manner. In general, they were satisfied with the app. Tasks that were associated with behavior execution and evaluation were performed with ease. Complex tasks such as tailoring a personal training schedule needed more effort. Learning effects, usefulness, and long-term satisfaction will be investigated through longitudinal follow-up studies.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingagedexercisefrail elderlyhealth behaviormobile devicesmobile phonetablet computerstelemedicineusability testing

Identifiers

PMID30707106
PMCPMC6376334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.