ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2019
Randomization tests as alternative analysis methods for behavior-analytic data.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical bioimpedance spectral markers distinguish balance ability in older adults without provoking fall risk.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Impact and resiliency of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare providers and their household members.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using Behavioural Skills Training with Healthcare Staff to Promote Greater Independence for People Living with Dementia: A Randomised Single-Case Experimental Design.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pragmatic Application of Risk Ratios in Behavior Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Article
- Testing delayed, gradual, and temporary treatment effects in randomized single-case experiments: A general response function framework.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Designing Activities to Teach Higher-Order Skills: How Feedback and Constraint Affect Learning of Experimental Design.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- The effectiveness of savouring interventions on well-being in adult clinical populations: A protocol for a systematic review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Defining and assessing immediacy in single-case experimental designs.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2022Review
- Monte Carlo Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs: An Untapped Resource for Applied Behavioral Researchers and Practitioners.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- A Priori Justification for Effect Measures in Single-Case Experimental Designs.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- Quantitative Techniques and Graphical Representations for Interpreting Results from Alternating Treatment Design.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- Meta-Analytic Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Behavior Science Research.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- Alteration of early attentional processing after analogue trauma exposure: evidence from event-related potentials.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Randomized Single-Case Intervention Designs and Analyses for Health Sciences Researchers: A Versatile Clinical Trials Companion.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2021Article
- Sustaining behavior reduction by transitioning the topography of the functional communication response.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2021Article
- The Effects of Obligatory and Preferential Frames on Delay Discounting.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2020Article
- Mitigating resurgence of destructive behavior using the discriminative stimuli of a multiple schedule.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2020Article
- Editorial: Behavior Science for the Public Welfare.Perspectives on behavior science · 2019Article
- Evaluations of heart rate during functional analyses of destructive behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Randomization statistics offer alternatives to many of the statistical methods commonly used in behavior analysis and the psychological sciences, more generally. These methods are more flexible than conventional parametric and nonparametric statistical techniques in that they make no assumptions about the underlying distribution of outcome variables, are relatively robust when applied to small-n data sets, and are generally applicable to between-groups, within-subjects, mixed, and single-case research designs. In the present article, we first will provide a historical overview of randomization methods. Next, we will discuss the properties of randomization statistics that may make them particularly well suited for analysis of behavior-analytic data. We will introduce readers to the major assumptions that undergird randomization methods, as well as some practical and computational considerations for their application. Finally, we will demonstrate how randomization statistics may be calculated for mixed and single-case research designs. Throughout, we will direct readers toward resources that they may find useful in developing randomization tests for their own data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.