Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706674›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2019

The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice.

Thomas H Reynolds, Allison Dalton, Lucas Calzini, Andrei Tuluca, Dakembay Hoyte, Stephen J Ives

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Small-molecule IGF1R inhibitors extend healthspan in a mouse model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Interpreting ribosome dynamics during mRNA translation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Aging reveals a sex-dependent susceptibility of sarcospan-deficient mice to cardiometabolic disease.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas H ReynoldsDepartment of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Allison DaltonDepartment of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Lucas CalziniDepartment of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Andrei TulucaDepartment of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Dakembay HoyteDepartment of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Stephen J IvesDepartment of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York.

Funding

Age-Related Obesity and Healthspan: Identifying Interventions and MechanismsR15AG053790 · NIA · SKIDMORE COLLEGE · PI REYNOLDS, THOMAS H · 2016 to 2016
$393k
NIA NIH HHS 1R15AG053790-01NIA NIH HHS R15 AG053790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A paucity of data exists regarding sex differences in age-related obesity and insulin resistance, particularly in the preclinical murine model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of age and sex on insulin action and body composition in C57BL/6J mice. Aged (AG, 18 months old) male C57BL/6J mice, glucose tolerance was diminished compared to young (YG, 6 months old) male mice (Area Under Curve: 95,103 ± 6818 vs. 64,005 ± 2031, P = 0.002). However, there was no age-related decline in glucose or insulin tolerance in females. Body composition analysis revealed that AG males had significantly greater body mass (42.2 ± 1.9 vs. 30.0 ± 0.4 g, P < 0.0001), fat mass (18.7 ± 2.0 vs. 3.3 ± 0.4 g, P < 0.0001), body fat (43.0 ± 3.0 vs. 11.0 ± 1.5%, P < 0.0001) than YG males. In AG females, body mass (32.8 ± 1.6 vs. 26.3 ± 0.9 g, P = 0.02) was higher, but fat mass (13.3 ± 2.0 vs. 9.5 ± 1.3 g, P = 0.24) and body fat (37.8 ± 4.8 vs. 35.5 ± 3.8%, P = 0.67) were similar when compared to YG females. AG males had significantly higher body mass (42.2 ± 1.9 vs. 32.8 ± 1.6 g, P = 0.001) and fat mass (18.7 ± 2.0 vs. 13.3 ± 2.0 g, P = 0.04) compared to AG females; however, body fat (43.0 ± 3.0 vs. 37.8 ± 4.8%, P = 0.28) was similar. Six weeks of treatment with MitoQ, a mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant, did not reverse age-related obesity in male mice. Surprisingly, obesity and insulin resistance appear to be reversed in the oldest of the old male mice (28 vs. 20 months). Our findings indicate that female mice, unlike males, are protected from age-related obesity and insulin resistance.

Indexed as

Body CompositionInsulin ResistanceAdiposityAge FactorsAnimalsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseEnergy MetabolismFemaleInsulinMaleMice, Inbred C57BLObesityProtective FactorsRisk FactorsSex FactorsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseInsulinAdipositybody compositionglucose metabolisminsulin resistance

Identifiers

PMID30706674
PMCPMC6356156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.