Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706382›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2019

Initial clinical experience of a prototype ultra-high-resolution CT for assessment of small intracranial arteries.

Hiroyuki Nagata, Kazuhiro Murayama, Shigetaka Suzuki, Ayumi Watanabe, Motoharu Hayakawa, Yasuo Saito, Kazuhiro Katada, Hiroshi Toyama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quantitative Emphysema Measurement On Ultra-High-Resolution CT Scans.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki NagataDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan. nagata_zaiken@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-955X
Kazuhiro MurayamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan.
Shigetaka SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan.
Ayumi WatanabeDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan.
Motoharu HayakawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan.
Yasuo SaitoCT Systems Division, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, 1385 Shimoishigami, Otawara-shi, Tochigi, 324-0036, Japan.
Kazuhiro KatadaJoint Research Laboratory of Advanced Medical Imaging, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan.
Hiroshi ToyamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1101, Japan.
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPCanon (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiagnostic and neurosurgical procedures require the precise localization of small intracranial arteries, but this may be difficult using conventional computed tomography angiography (CTA). This study was conducted to evaluate the quality of CTA images acquired using a prototype ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) system compared with those acquired using a conventional computed tomography (C-CT) system. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom July through September 2015, 10 adult patients (6 women and 4 men) previously scanned by C-CT were examined using U-HRCT to locate and assess cerebral aneurysms. The bilateral ophthalmic artery (Opth A), anterior choroidal artery (Acho A), and thalamoperforating arteries (TPAs) were visually evaluated in randomly presented CTA images. Images were graded on a 5-point scale, and differences in scores between U-HRCT and C-CT were evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsVisual evaluation scores for images of the Opth A, Acho A, and TPAs were significantly higher for U-HRCT than for C-CT. U-HRCT images achieved good visualization (score > 3) for C-CT images with poor visualization (score < 3) in 66.7-100% of all the small arteries.

conclusionU-HRCT is superior to C-CT for detecting and evaluating clinically significant small intracranial arteries.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCerebral AngiographyCerebral ArteriesComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsComputed tomography angiographySmall intracranial arteriesUltra-high-resolution computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID30706382
OpenAlexW2912980188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.