ArticleJournal of abnormal child psychology2019
Peer Victimization and Selective Attention in Adolescence: Evidence from a Monozygotic Twin Difference Design.
Article in Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Being Bullied Predict Adolescent Psychological Problems? The Moderating Role of Parental Responses to Adolescents' Negative Emotions.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2025Article
- The effect of peer victimisation on cognitive development in childhood: evidence for mediation via inflammation.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
- Childhood inhibition predicts adolescent social anxiety: Findings from a longitudinal twin study.Development and psychopathology · 2022Article
- Peer Victimization Influences Attention Processing Beyond the Effects of Childhood Maltreatment by Caregivers.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Integrative Brain Dynamics in Childhood Bullying Victimization: Cognitive and Emotional Convergence Associated With Stress Psychopathology.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Review
- Identifying Factors Influencing Attention in Adolescents with a Co-Created Questionnaire: A Citizen Science Approach with Secondary Students in Barcelona, Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Bullying Victimization and Trauma.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Wisconsin Twin Project Overview: Temperament and Affective Neuroscience.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2019Review
- Longitudinal Research at the Interface of Affective Neuroscience, Developmental Psychopathology, Health and Behavioral Genetics: Findings from the Wisconsin Twin Project.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peer victimization impacts 13% of adolescents worldwide (Currie et al. 2012). Despite its prevalence and associated adverse outcomes, global cognitive processes that could be affected by peer victimization have not been thoroughly investigated. Using a monozygotic (MZ) twin difference design that rigorously controls for the influence of genetic and familial level confounders, we examined the relation between peer victimization exposure and selective attention processes during an affective go/no go task. Twins who experienced more severe peer victimization were biased towards detecting goal relevant stimuli during the task. Our findings suggest an environmentally salient relation between peer victimization and goal oriented selective attention. Future work should investigate how this process might serve to enhance or buffer risk of peer victimization exposure for developing later adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.