Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706202›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2019

Never the Twain…Introduction to the Special Issue Psychology of Religion: Dialogues Between Sociocultural and Cognitive Perspectives.

Laure Kloetzer, Fabrice Clément

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laure KloetzerInstitut de Psychologie et Education, Université de Neuchâtel, Louis-Agassiz 1, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. laure.kloetzer@unine.ch.
Fabrice ClémentCentre de Sciences Cognitives, Université de Neuchâtel, Pierre-à-Mazel 7, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-4362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bringing together perspectives is rarely an easy task. By assembling researchers from cognitive and cultural traditions to discuss their reciprocal research in the field of psychology of religion, we thought that we will end up with an ecumenical conclusion, everyone being convinced that the other perspective will enrich her or his approach in the future. In this introduction, our objective is to show that it was not exactly the case and, by writing a two-voices introduction, to understand why we were eventually not so sure that we were all studying the same object.

Indexed as

CulturePsychologyReligion and PsychologySocial SciencesHumansCognitive psychologyCultural psychologyEpistemologyPsychology of religion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.