Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706150›Full record

SynthesisCurrent psychiatry reports2019

National Child Mental Health Quality Measures: Adherence Rates and Extent of Evidence for Clinical Validity.

Bonnie T Zima, Juliet B Edgcomb, Samantha A Shugarman

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current psychiatry reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Outcomes that Matter to Youth and Families in Behavioral Health Services.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Caregiver Attendance as a Quality Indicator in the Implementation of Multiple Evidence-Based Practices for Children.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bonnie T ZimaUCLA-Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bzima@mednet.ucla.edu.
Juliet B EdgcombUCLA-Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Samantha A ShugarmanAmerican Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo provide an overview of the selection process and annual updates of the child mental health measures within the Child Core Set, describe national and statewide adherence rates, and summarize findings from a systematic literature review examining measure adherence rates and whether adherence is associated with improved clinical outcomes. RECENT

findingsFive national quality measures target child mental health care processes. On average, national adherence varied widely by state, and performance did not substantially improve during the past 5 years. Mean national adherence rates for the two measures related to timeliness of care were below 50%. For each measure, scientific evidence to support the association between adherence and improved clinical outcomes was scarce. Investment in academic-agency partnered research to standardize methods for publicly reporting adherence to national child mental health quality measures and validation of these measures should be a national priority for child healthcare research.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareChildHumansMental DisordersMental HealthReproducibility of ResultsAdherenceChild mental healthQuality measuresValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.