ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
Microbial diversity assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated soils and the biostimulation and bioaugmentation processes.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prokaryotic, Microeukaryotic, and Fungal Composition in a Long-Term Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Contaminated Brownfield.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- PCB-77 biodegradation potential of biosurfactant producing bacterial isolates recovered from contaminated soil.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Selective pressure of biphenyl/polychlorinated biphenyls on the formation of aerobic bacterial associations and their biodegradative potential.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
- Structure and diversity of native bacterial communities in soils contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls.AMB Express · 2020Article
- Mapping Microbial Capacities for Bioremediation: Genes to Genomics.Indian journal of microbiology · 2020Review
- Assessment of Biodegradation Efficiency of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Soil Using Three Individual Bacterial Strains and Their Mixed Culture.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to know the biodiversity of total microorganisms contained in two polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated aged soils and evaluate the strategies of bioaugmentation and biostimulation to biodegrade the biphenyls. Besides, the aerobic cultivable microorganisms were isolated and their capacity to biodegrade a commercial mixture of six congeners of biphenyls was evaluated. Biodiversity of contaminated soils was dominated by Actinobacteria (42.79%) and Firmicutes (42.32%) phyla, and others in smaller proportions such as Proteobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Chloroflexi, and Bacteroidetes. At the genus level, the majority of the population did not exceed 7% of relative abundance, including Bacillus, Achromobacter, Clostridium, and Pontibacter. Furthermore, four autochthonous bacterial cultures were possible isolates from the soils, which were identified by partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, as Bacillus sp., Achromobacter sp., Pseudomonas stutzeri, and Bacillus subtilis, which were used for the bioaugmentation process. The bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies achieved a biodegradation of about 60% of both soils after 8 weeks of the process; also, the four isolates were used as mixed culture to biodegrade a commercial mix of six polychlorinated biphenyl congeners; after 4 weeks of incubation, the concentration decreased from 0.5 mg/L to 0.23 mg/L.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30706145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.