Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706106›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019

Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative MRI After Fistula-in-Ano Surgery: Lessons Learnt from An Audit of 1323 MRI At a Single Centre.

Pankaj Garg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-Term Clinical Results of Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Treatment of Low Trans-Sphincteric Anal Fistulas.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj GargIndus Super Specialty Hospital, Mohali, India. drgargpankaj@yahoo.com.
Indo-US Super Speciality Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSeveral studies have evaluated the efficacy of preoperative MRI in fistula-in-ano. However, the evaluation of MRI after fistula-in-ano surgery has never been done. The aim was to evaluate the utility of MRI in postoperative period after fistula-in-ano surgery.

methodsPreoperative MRI was done in all the patients presenting with fistula-in-ano. Postoperative MRI was done to check radiological healing in clinically healed fistulas or when postoperative complication/healing problem was seen. The postoperative MRI was compared with preoperative MRI and correlated with the clinical picture.

resultsA total of 1323 MRI were done in 1003 fistula-in-ano patients, out of which 702 patients underwent surgery. In 702 patients, there were 361 recurrent fistulas, 153 had associated abscess, 388 had multiple tracts, 146 had horseshoe tract, and 76 had supralevator fistula. In total, 320 postoperative MRI scans were done in 180/702 patients. The requirement of postoperative MRI was significantly higher in complex (grades III-V) than simple fistulas (grades I-II) [43.5% (136/313) vs. 11.3% (44/389), respectively, P < 0.0001]. In early postoperative period (8 weeks), healing (granulation) tissue was difficult to differentiate from active fistula tract/pus. The complete radiological healing took at least 10-12 weeks. So getting MRI scan for the assessment of healing was more accurate after 12 weeks. MRI was very accurate to identify postoperative complications like abscess, missed tract or non-healing of a tract. MRI detected such complications even in apparently clinically healed tracts. Closure/healing of internal opening and intersphincteric tract was assessed accurately by MRI and correlated well with the fistula healing.

conclusionsMRI is highly useful to assess healing and detect complications after fistula surgery.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultClinical AuditFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodRectal FistulaWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID30706106
OpenAlexW2911635621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.