Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706094›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Willingness towards cognitive engagement: a preliminary study based on a behavioural entropy approach.

Elena Daprati, Angela Sirigu, Michel Desmurget, Eugenio Martinelli, Daniele Nico

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena DapratiDipartimento di Medicina dei Sistemi and CBMS, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. elena.daprati@uniroma2.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0475
Angela SiriguInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, Bron, France.
Michel DesmurgetInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, Bron, France.
Eugenio MartinelliDipartimento di Ingegneria Elettronica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Daniele NicoDipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faced with a novel task some people enthusiastically embark in it and work with determination, while others soon lose interest and progressively reduce their efforts. Although cognitive neuroscience has explored the behavioural and neural features of apathy, the why's and how's of positive engagement are only starting to be understood. Stemming from the observation that the left hemisphere is commonly associated to a proactive ('do something') disposition, we run a preliminary study exploring the possibility that individual variability in eagerness to engage in cognitive tasks could reflect a preferred left- or right-hemisphere functioning mode. We adapted a task based on response-independent reinforcement and used entropy to characterize the degree of involvement, diversification, and predictability of responses. Entropy was higher in women, who were overall more active, less dependent on instructions, and never reduced their engagement during the task. Conversely, men showed lower entropy, took longer pauses, and became significantly less active by the end of the allotted time, renewing their efforts mainly in response to negative incentives. These findings are discussed in the light of neurobiological data on gender differences in behaviour.

Indexed as

IntentionReinforcement, PsychologyAdultApathyEntropyFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSex FactorsYoung AdultApathyEntropyIndividual differencesInitiativeIntention to actResponse strategy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.