Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706039›Full record

ArticlePain reports2018

NEO6860, modality-selective TRPV1 antagonist: a randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in patients with osteoarthritis knee pain.

Pierre Arsenault, Dan Chiche, William Brown, Jeffrey Miller, Roi Treister, Richard Leff, Philippe Walker, Nathaniel Katz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Ion channels as therapeutic targets in osteoarthritis.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Directions for analgesic development.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. TRPA1, TRPV1, and Caffeine: Pain and Analgesia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pierre ArsenaultDiex Recherche Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Dan ChicheNEOMED Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
William BrownNEOMED Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jeffrey MillerConsultant Exploratory Medicines, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Roi TreisterFaculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Richard LeffLLC, Chadds Ford, PA, USA.
Philippe WalkerNEOMED Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nathaniel KatzAnalgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA.
NEOMED Institute · CAFord Motor Company (United States) · USTufts University · USUniversity of Haifa · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNEO6860 is a TRPV1 antagonist when activated by capsaicin but not by heat or pH, developed to relieve pain without the adverse events reported with non-modality-selective TRPV1 antagonists.

objectiveThe primary Objective of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of NEO6860 after 1 day oral dosing in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence stage I, II or III osteoarthritis of the knee.

methodThis randomized, double-blinded, 3-period crossover, phase II study compared 1 day (2 doses) of NEO6860 (500 mg twice a day), placebo, and naproxen in 54 patients with osteoarthritis knee pain. Primary endpoint was reduction in pain intensity (PI) on Numerical Rating Scale after exercise, using the staircase test, 8 hours after dose.

resultsLevel of PI, compared with baseline, was numerically lower during NEO6860 and naproxen periods vs placebo at 3 and 24 hours, but not at 8 hours after first dose. A statistically significant effect for naproxen and a trend for NEO6860 were observed at 3 and 24 hours. Least square means' (95% confidence interval) change in PI at 24 hours was -0.67 (-1.09 to -0.26), -0.97 (-1.39 to -0.55), -0.29 (-0.71 to 0.13) for NEO6860, naproxen, and placebo, respectively. NEO6860 exposure was ∼1.6 times higher compared with previous phase I. In this study, NEO6860 safety profile was less favorable than naproxen or placebo. Possibly NEO6860-related adverse events included: feel hot, headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, hypoaesthesia, and increased blood pressure.

conclusionIn this exploratory study, NEO6860 did not statistically significantly outperform placebo but showed an analgesic trend, without impacting body temperature and heat pain perception. Further studies are warranted to explore the potential of NEO6860 in other pain indications. We intent to optimize the dose and evaluate analgesic synergism with other mechanism.

Indexed as

Analgesic effectChange in heat pain perceptionHyperthermiaNEO6860Osteoarthritis of the kneeStaircase testTRPV1 antagonist

Identifiers

PMID30706039
PMCPMC6344137
OpenAlexW2898181620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.