Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706019›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Predictors of the Predominance of NonIndex Pain After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Tumors.

Tetsuo Saito, Ryo Toya, Etsushi Tomitaka, Tomohiko Matsuyama, Satoshi Ninomura, Takahiro Watakabe, Natsuo Oya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  2. Influence of pain duration on pain outcomes following palliative radiotherapy for painful tumors: the sooner the irradiation, the better?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuo SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Ryo ToyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Etsushi TomitakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tomohiko MatsuyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Satoshi NinomuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takahiro WatakabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Natsuo OyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumamoto University Hospital · JPKumamoto Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEven when index pain (pain caused by the irradiated tumor) is palliated after radiation therapy (RT), patients may not derive the full benefits of RT in the presence of another, more intense pain. In this case-control study with prospectively collected data, we sought to identify predictors of the predominance of nonindex pain after palliative RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brief Pain Inventory data were collected from patients who received RT for painful tumors. The treating radiation oncologists prospectively evaluated the intensity and origin of nonindex pain. Patients were diagnosed with predominance of other pain (POP) if nonindex pain of malignant or unknown origin was present and had a greater worst pain score than the index pain at the 1- or 2-month follow-up. Changes in pain interference from baseline to follow-up were compared between the 2 groups using Mann-Whitney

resultsOf the 170 patients who were evaluable at the 2-month follow-up, 24 (14%) were diagnosed with POP. At the 2-month follow-up examination of the patients with POP, none of the items of the pain interference scores were reduced from baseline; in contrast, patients without POP experienced significant reductions in all items. Multivariable analysis using the backward elimination method indicated that age ≤65 years, the presence of nonindex pain of malignant or unknown origin at baseline, and no opioid analgesic use at baseline were significant independent predictors of POP. As the number of the risk factors increased, the proportion of patients with POP increased.

conclusionsWe identified three predictors of POP. For patients likely to have POP, careful follow-up is important, and new palliative RT or analgesics should be used when needed.

Identifiers

PMID30706019
PMCPMC6349584
OpenAlexW2888381599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.