Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30706015›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With a Focal Simultaneous Integrated Boost: Acute Toxicity and Dosimetry Results From a Prospective Trial.

Andrew M McDonald, Michael C Dobelbower, Eddy S Yang, Grant M Clark, Rojymon Jacob, Robert Y Kim, Rex A Cardan, Richard Popple, Jeffrey W Nix, Soroush Rais-Bahrami and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dosimetric evaluation of ultrafractionated dose escalation with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion using 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac in localized prostate cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrew M McDonaldUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Michael C DobelbowerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Eddy S YangUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Grant M ClarkEast Tennessee Radiation Oncology PC, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Rojymon JacobUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Robert Y KimUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Rex A CardanUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Richard PoppleUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Jeffrey W NixUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Urology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Soroush Rais-BahramiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Urology, Birmingham, Alabama.
John B FiveashUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to report the early toxicity results of a prospective clinical trial of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the entire prostate with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined focal lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients included men with biopsy-proven prostate stage T1c to T2c adenocarcinoma, a Gleason score ≤7, and prostate-specific antigen values of ≤20 ng/mL, who had at least 1 focal lesion visible on MRI and a total prostate volume no greater than 120 cm

resultsA total of 26 men were enrolled, and all underwent SBRT as planned. Twenty patients (77%) had intermediate-risk features, and the remainder were low risk. A treatment plan that met the protocol-defined goals for all cases was developed. Two patients (7.7%) developed acute urinary symptoms that required the temporary placement of a Foley catheter. No grade 3+ toxicity events were observed.

conclusionsPlanning and delivery of prostate SBRT with a whole prostate dose of 36.25 Gy and a focal 40 Gy SIB is feasible. Early follow-up suggests that this treatment is not associated with undue morbidity.

Identifiers

PMID30706015
PMCPMC6349624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.