Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705994›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

A randomised controlled trial of potential for pharmacologic prevention of new-onset albuminuria, hypertension and diabetes in a remote Aboriginal Australian community, 2008-2013.

Wendy E Hoy, Christopher M Reid, Molla Huq, Beverly J McLeod, Susan A Mott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendy E HoyCentre for Chronic Disease and NHMRC CKD Centre for Research Excellence, School of Clinical Medicine, Royal Brisbane Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christopher M ReidSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Molla HuqMonash Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Beverly J McLeodCentre for Chronic Disease and NHMRC CKD Centre for Research Excellence, School of Clinical Medicine, Royal Brisbane Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Susan A MottCentre for Chronic Disease and NHMRC CKD Centre for Research Excellence, School of Clinical Medicine, Royal Brisbane Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe conducted a double-blind randomised controlled trial in a remote-living Australian Aboriginal group at high risk for chronic disease to assess whether pharmacological treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) could delay the onset of albuminuria, hypertension or diabetes in people currently free of those conditions.

methodsEligibility criteria in 2008 were age ≥18yr, blood pressure ≤140/90 mm/Hg, urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) < 3.4 mg/mmol, normal levels of glycosylated haemoglobin, and, in females, infertility. A 2011 amendment allowed enrolment of fertile females using long-term contraception. "Treatment" was the ACEi perindopril arginine, or placebo, and participant events were ACR ≥3.4 mg/mmol and/or blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg and/or haemoglobin A1c >6.5%, and/or cardiovascular events. Results were analysed in 125 randomised participants who commenced treatment.

resultsRecruitment was low, especially of women, and dropout rates high: there were finally 60 and 65 people in the ACEi and placebo groups respectively. In females, there were no events among 10 in the ACEi group, versus 5 events among 17 in the placebo group, and longitudinal ACR, HbA1c and blood pressure levels supported probable benefit of ACEi. There was no benefit of ACEi in males, but a probable benefit on diabetes/hypertension events. With the genders combined, there was probable reduction of diabetes (zero vs 4 events, p = 0.068), and of diabetes or hypertension (zero vs 5 events, p = 0.037). DISCUSSION: In this high-risk population, ACEi probably delays development of albuminuria, diabetes and hypertension in females, and of non-ACR events overall. Repeat investigation with a larger sample size is warranted.

Indexed as

ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitorACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratioAlbuminuria/hypertensionAngiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)DiabetesHbA1c, glycosylated haemoglobin A1cIndigenous AustralianRandomised controlled trialRCT, randomised controlled trialRemote-living

Identifiers

PMID30705994
PMCPMC6348198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.