Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705925›Full record

ArticleData in brief2019

A visual working memory dataset collection with bootstrap Independent Component Analysis for comparison of electroencephalographic preprocessing pipelines.

Fiorenzo Artoni, Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fiorenzo ArtoniThe Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Arnaud DelormeSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0559, USA.
Scott MakeigSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0559, USA.

Funding

EEGLAB: Software for Analysis of Human Brain DynamicsR01NS047293 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig · 2004 to 2026
$10.2M
BRAIN INITIATIVE RESOURCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A HUMAN NEUROELECTROMAGNETIC DATA ARCHIVE AND TOOLS RESOURCE (NEMAR)R24MH120037 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Amitava Majumdar · 2019 to 2026
$5.5M
The Open EEGLAB Portal ProjectR01EB023297 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DELORME, ARNAUD, MAJUMDAR, AMITAVA · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023297NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH120037NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present an electroencephalographic (EEG) collection of 71-channel datasets recorded from 14 subjects (7 males, 7 females, aged 20-40 years) while performing a visual working memory task with a T set of 150 Independent Component Analysis (ICA) decompositions by Extended Infomax using RELICA, each on a bootstrap resampling of the data. These data are linked to the paper "Applying dimension reduction to EEG data by Principal Component Analysis reduces the quality of its subsequent Independent Component decomposition" [1]. Independent components (ICs) are clustered within subject and thereby associated with a quality index (QIc) measure of their stability to data resampling. Sets of single ICA decompositions obtained after applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the data to perform dimension reduction retaining (85%, 95%, 99%) of data variance are also included, as are the positions of the best fitting equivalent dipoles for ICs whose scalp projections are compatible with a compact brain source. These bootstrap ICs may be used as benchmarks for different data preprocessing pipelines and/or ICA algorithms, allowing investigation of the effects that noise or insufficient data have on the quality of ICA decompositions.

Identifiers

PMID30705925
PMCPMC6348727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.