Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705894›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2019

Clinical significance of exosomes as potential biomarkers in cancer.

Chi-Hin Wong, Yang-Chao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The role of exosomes in bladder cancer immunotherapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The role of extracellular vesicles in skeletal muscle wasting.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Theranostic signature of tumor-derived exosomes in cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chi-Hin WongSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yang-Chao ChenSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExosomes are microvesicles, measuring 30-100 nm in diameter. They are widely distributed in body fluids, including blood, bile, urine and saliva. Cancer-derived exosomes carry a wide variety of DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids, and may serve as novel biomarkers in cancer.

aimTo summarize the performance of exosomal biomarkers in cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

methodsRelevant publications in the literature were identified by search of the "PubMed" database up to September 11, 2018. The quality of the included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2 and REMARK. For assessment of diagnostic biomarkers, 47 biomarkers and 2240 patients from 30 studies were included.

resultsOur results suggested that these exosomal biomarkers had excellent diagnostic ability in various types of cancer, with good sensitivity and specificity. For assessment of prognostic markers, 50 biomarkers and 4797 patients from 42 studies were included. We observed that exosomal biomarkers had prognostic values in overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.

conclusionExosomes can function as potential biomarkers in cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Indexed as

BiomarkerCancerDiagnosisExosomePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30705894
PMCPMC6354096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.