Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705736›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2019

Comparison of clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent incidental or emergency appendectomy.

Sami Akbulut, Cemalettin Koc, Huseyin Kocaaslan, Fatih Gonultas, Emine Samdanci, Saim Yologlu, Sezai Yilmaz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05202600 (Justification of Incidental Appendectomy With Respect to Pathohistological Findings), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05202600 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Justification of Incidental Appendectomy With Respect to Pathohistological Findings

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital of SplitRan2022 to 2022Enrolled1,000ConditionsAppendix TumorArmsAppendectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Histopathological features of incidental appendectomy specimens obtained from living liver donors.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sami AkbulutDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey. akbulutsami@gmail.com.
Cemalettin KocDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Huseyin KocaaslanDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Fatih GonultasDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Emine SamdanciDepartment of Pathology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Saim YologluDepartment of Biostatistics, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Sezai YilmazDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Inonu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidental appendectomy can be defined as the removal of a clinically normal appendix during another surgical procedure unrelated to appendicitis or other appendicular diseases.

aimTo compare the demographic, biochemical, and histopathological features of the patients who underwent incidental and standard appendectomy.

methodsThe demographic, biochemical, and histopathological data of 72 patients (Incidental App group) who underwent incidental appendectomy during living donor hepatectomy at our Liver Transplant Center between June 2009 and December 2016 were compared with data of 288 patients (Acute App group) who underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. The Incidental App group was matched at random in a 1:4 ratio with the Acute App group in the same time frame. Appendectomy specimens of both groups were re-evaluated by two experienced pathologists.

resultsStatistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of age (

conclusionCareful inspection of the entire abdominal cavity is useful for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery such as donor hepatectomy. We think that experience is parallel to the surgeon's foresight, and we should not hesitate to perform incidental appendectomy when necessary.

Indexed as

Acute appendicitisIncidental appendectomyLiving donor hepatectomy

Identifiers

PMID30705736
PMCPMC6354071
OpenAlexW2913919167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.