Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705688›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2019

A low-cost and open-source platform for automated imaging.

Max R Lien, Richard J Barker, Zhiwei Ye, Matthew H Westphall, Ruohan Gao, Aditya Singh, Simon Gilroy, Philip A Townsend

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Max R Lien1Russell Labs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Richard J Barker2Birge Hall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Zhiwei Ye1Russell Labs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Matthew H Westphall1Russell Labs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Ruohan Gao1Russell Labs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Aditya SinghFrazier Rogers Hall, 1741 Museum Road, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
Simon Gilroy2Birge Hall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Philip A Townsend1Russell Labs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-8774
University of Wisconsin System · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote monitoring of plants using hyperspectral imaging has become an important tool for the study of plant growth, development, and physiology. Many applications are oriented towards use in field environments to enable non-destructive analysis of crop responses due to factors such as drought, nutrient deficiency, and disease, e.g., using tram, drone, or airplane mounted instruments. The field setting introduces a wide range of uncontrolled environmental variables that make validation and interpretation of spectral responses challenging, and as such lab- and greenhouse-deployed systems for plant studies and phenotyping are of increasing interest. In this study, we have designed and developed an open-source, hyperspectral reflectance-based imaging system for lab-based plant experiments: the HyperScanner. The reliability and accuracy of HyperScanner were validated using drought and salt stress experiments with

resultsA robust, scalable, and reliable system was created. The system was built using open-sourced parts, and all custom parts, operational methods, and data have been made publicly available in order to maintain the open-source aim of HyperScanner. The gathered reflectance images showed changes in narrowband red and infrared reflectance spectra for each of the stress tests that was evident prior to other visual physiological responses and exhibited congruence with measurements using full-range contact spectrometers.

conclusionsHyperScanner offers the potential for reliable and inexpensive laboratory hyperspectral imaging systems. HyperScanner was able to quickly collect accurate reflectance curves on a variety of plant stress experiments. The resulting images showed spectral differences in plants shortly after application of a treatment but before visual manifestation. HyperScanner increases the capacity for spectroscopic and imaging-based analytical tools by providing more access to hyperspectral analyses in the laboratory setting.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisAutomatedHyperspectral imagingImaging spectroscopyLow-costNon-invasiveOpen-sourceReflectance

Identifiers

PMID30705688
PMCPMC6348682
OpenAlexW2913612442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.