Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705618›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Investigation of Event-Based Surfaces for High-Speed Detection, Unsupervised Feature Extraction, and Object Recognition.

Saeed Afshar, Tara Julia Hamilton, Jonathan Tapson, André van Schaik, Gregory Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saeed AfsharBiomedical Engineering and Neuroscience Program, The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tara Julia HamiltonBiomedical Engineering and Neuroscience Program, The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan TapsonBiomedical Engineering and Neuroscience Program, The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
André van SchaikBiomedical Engineering and Neuroscience Program, The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gregory CohenBiomedical Engineering and Neuroscience Program, The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we investigate event-based feature extraction through a rigorous framework of testing. We test a hardware efficient variant of Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity (STDP) on a range of spatio-temporal kernels with different surface decaying methods, decay functions, receptive field sizes, feature numbers, and back end classifiers. This detailed investigation can provide helpful insights and rules of thumb for performance vs. complexity trade-offs in more generalized networks, especially in the context of hardware implementation, where design choices can incur significant resource costs. The investigation is performed using a new dataset consisting of model airplanes being dropped free-hand close to the sensor. The target objects exhibit a wide range of relative orientations and velocities. This range of target velocities, analyzed in multiple configurations, allows a rigorous comparison of time-based decaying surfaces (time surfaces) vs. event index-based decaying surface (index surfaces), which are used to perform unsupervised feature extraction, followed by target detection and recognition. We examine each processing stage by comparison to the use of raw events, as well as a range of alternative layer structures, and the use of random features. By comparing results from a linear classifier and an ELM classifier, we evaluate how each element of the system affects accuracy. To generate time and index surfaces, the most commonly used kernels, namely event binning kernels, linearly, and exponentially decaying kernels, are investigated. Index surfaces were found to outperform time surfaces in recognition when invariance to target velocity was made a requirement. In the investigation of network structure, larger networks of neurons with large receptive field sizes were found to perform best. We find that a small number of event-based feature extractors can project the complex spatio-temporal event patterns of the dataset to an almost linearly separable representation in feature space, with best performing linear classifier achieving 98.75% recognition accuracy, using only 25 feature extracting neurons.

Indexed as

event-basedevent-based visionneuromorphicrecognition and classificationunsupervided learning

Identifiers

PMID30705618
PMCPMC6344467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.