ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2019
Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Three-dimensionalIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Pooled it
- Three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A 2-year follow-up study at Hue Central Hospital.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Refinement of recto-sigmoid colon vaginoplasty using a three-dimensional laparoscopic technique.Medicine · 2021Article
- 2DWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Satisfactory short-term outcome of total laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal in obese patients: a comparative study with open techniques.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- The feasibility and safety of complete laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with preservation of the ileocecal junction in right-transverse colon cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A 3-year follow-up study.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOverlapped delta-shaped anastomosis is a newly developed intracorporeal procedure in totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. We explored the safety and efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped anastomosis and compared its short-term outcomes with those of two-dimensional (2D) surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom January 2016 to March 2018, 97 colon cancer patients were grouped into the 3D group (43 patients) and the 2D group (54 patients); they underwent totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped anastomosis by 3D and 2D laparoscopy, respectively. Data regarding the clinical characteristics, surgical and pathological outcomes, postoperative recovery and complications were collected and compared.
resultsThese two groups were well balanced in terms of age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, previous abdominal operation history and preoperative chemotherapy (
conclusion3D totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis is safe and effective, with satisfactory short-term outcomes. In addition, it is less time-consuming than 2D surgery regarding the overlapped anastomosis procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.