ReviewNature medicine2019
Publisher Correction: The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions.
Review in Nature medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative molecular cartography of emergency myelopoiesis reveals conserved modules of hematopoietic activation.Cell stem cell · 2026Article
- Panel-based RNA fusion sequencing improves diagnostics of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2024Article
- CBFA2T3-GLIS2 model of pediatric acute megakaryoblastic leukemia identifies FOLR1 as a CAR T cell target.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Article
- Targeting PARP proteins in acute leukemia: DNA damage response inhibition and therapeutic strategies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Murine Models of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- First case report of a NUP98-PMX1 rearrangement in de novo acute myeloid leukemia and literature review.BMC medical genomics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the version of this article originally published, the color key in Fig. 1a was wrong. In the Cytogenetics key, the box over t(8;21) originally was green. It should have been red, matching the color of the sections of the pie graphs below the key that were labeled with 15% and 19%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.