ArticleScientific reports2019
Screening for epistatic selection signatures: A simulation study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interchromosomal linkage disequilibrium analysis reveals strong indications of sign epistasis in wheat breeding families.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association analysis revealed novel candidate genes for body measurement traits in indigenous Gudali and crossbred Simgud in Cameroon.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Parent-offspring genotyped trios unravelling genomic regions with gametic and genotypic epistatic transmission bias on the cattle genome.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Correlation scan: identifying genomic regions that affect genetic correlations applied to fertility traits.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- A linkage disequilibrium-based statistical test for Genome-Wide Epistatic Selection Scans in structured populations.Heredity · 2021Article
- GALLO: An R package for genomic annotation and integration of multiple data sources in livestock for positional candidate loci.GigaScience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting combinations of alleles that diverged between subpopulations via selection signature statistics can contribute to decipher the phenomenon of epistasis. This research focused on the simulation of genomic data from subpopulations under divergent epistatic selection (ES). We used D'
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.