Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705119›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Evaluation of INSeq To Identify Genes Essential for

Ramamoorthy Sivakumar, Jothi Ranjani, Udayakumar S Vishnu, Sathyanarayanan Jayashree, Gabriel L Lozano, Jessica Miles, Nichole A Broderick, Changhui Guan, Paramasamy Gunasekaran, Jo Handelsman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Massively parallel mutant selection identifies genetic determinants ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Dissimilar gene repertoires ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramamoorthy SivakumarDepartment of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India.
Jothi RanjaniDepartment of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India.
Udayakumar S VishnuDepartment of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India.
Sathyanarayanan JayashreeDepartment of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India.
Gabriel L LozanoDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Jessica MilesDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Nichole A BroderickDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-6830-9456
Changhui GuanThe Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT.
Paramasamy GunasekaranVIT Bhopal University, Sahore, India.
Jo HandelsmanWisconsin Institute for Discovery and Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53715 jo.handelsman@wisc.edu jrajendhran@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3488-5030
Jeyaprakash RajendhranDepartment of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India jo.handelsman@wisc.edu jrajendhran@gmail.com.
Madurai Kamaraj University · INYale University · USBarkatullah University · INJackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Connecticut · USWisconsin Institutes for Discovery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reciprocal interaction between rhizosphere bacteria and their plant hosts results in a complex battery of genetic and physiological responses. In this study, we used insertion sequencing (INSeq) to reveal the genetic determinants responsible for the fitness of

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialSymbiosisBacterial ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutagenesis, InsertionalPlant RootsPseudomonas aeruginosaZea maysBacterial ProteinsINSeqnext generation sequencingPlant-growth promoting rhizobacteriasymbiosisTn-Seqtransposon mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID30705119
PMCPMC6404608
OpenAlexW2950544787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.