Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30705110›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2019

The CONSTANCES job exposure matrix based on self-reported exposure to physical risk factors: development and evaluation.

Bradley A Evanoff, Marcus Yung, Skye Buckner-Petty, Johan Hviid Andersen, Yves Roquelaure, Alexis Descatha, Ann Marie Dale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Construction of a musculoskeletal job-exposure matrix in Korea.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley A EvanoffDivision of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Marcus YungDivision of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Skye Buckner-PettyDivision of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Johan Hviid AndersenDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Regional Hospital West Jutland, University Research Clinic, Herning, Denmark.
Yves RoquelaureINSERM, U1085, IRSET (Institute de recherché en santé, environnement et travail), ESTER Team, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6918-0909
Alexis Descatha *INSERM, U1085, IRSET (Institute de recherché en santé, environnement et travail), ESTER Team, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6028-3186
Ann Marie Dale *Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

DEVELOPING A GENERAL POPULATION JOB EXPOSURE MATRIX FOR STUDIES OF WORK-RELATED MSDR01OH011076 · OH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2016 to 2018
$988k
ACL HHS R01OH011076NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesJob exposure matrices (JEMs) can be constructed from expert-rated assessments, direct measurement and self-reports. This paper describes the construction of a general population JEM based on self-reported physical exposures, its ability to create homogeneous exposure groups (HEG) and the use of different exposure metrics to express job-level estimates.

methodsThe JEM was constructed from physical exposure data obtained from the Cohorte des consultants des Centres d'examens de santé (CONSTANCES). Using data from 35 526 eligible participants, the JEM consisted of 27 physical risk factors from 407 job codes. We determined whether the JEM created HEG by performing non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance (NPMANOVA). We compared three exposure metrics (mean, bias-corrected mean, median) by calculating within-job and between-job variances, and by residual plots between each metric and individual reported exposure.

resultsNPMANOVA showed significantly higher between-job than within-job variance among the 27 risk factors (F(253,21964)=61.33, p<0.0001, r

conclusionsCONSTANCES JEM using self-reported data yielded HEGs, and can thus classify individual participants based on job title. The bias-corrected mean metric may better reflect the shape of the underlying exposure distribution. This JEM opens new possibilities for using unbiased exposure estimates to study the effects of workplace physical exposures on a variety of health conditions within a large general population study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthOccupational InjuriesProgram EvaluationRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSelf Reportergonomicsexposure assessmentmusculoskeletal disordersoccupational biomechanical exposure

Identifiers

PMID30705110
PMCPMC6520135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.