ArticleBMC medical genomics2019
Computational identification of deleterious synonymous variants in human genomes using a feature-based approach.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting Functional Effects of Synonymous Variants: A Systematic Review and Perspectives.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Pooled it
- CDsyn: A comprehensive database for deleterious human synonymous variation prediction.iScience · 2026Article
- SyMetrics: an integrated machine learning model for evaluating the pathogenicity of synonymous variants in the human genome.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Bacterial gene 5' ends have unusual mutation rates that can mislead tests of selection.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Ensemble learning-based predictor for driver synonymous mutation with sequence representation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- In silico methods for predicting functional synonymous variants.Genome biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Synonymous Variants: Necessary Nuance in Our Understanding of Cancer Drivers and Treatment Outcomes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Review
- Decoding the effects of synonymous variants.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- New approaches to predict the effect of co-occurring variants on protein characteristics.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- An improved DNA-binding hot spot residues prediction method by exploring interfacial neighbor properties.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Synonymous variants that disrupt messenger RNA structure are significantly constrained in the human population.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Predicting Hot Spot Residues at Protein-DNA Binding Interfaces Based on Sequence Information.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021Article
- Analysis of Pathogenic Pseudoexons Reveals Novel Mechanisms Driving Cryptic Splicing.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- CAPICE: a computational method for Consequence-Agnostic Pathogenicity Interpretation of Clinical Exome variations.Genome medicine · 2020Article
- Somatic synonymous mutations in regulatory elements contribute to the genetic aetiology of melanoma.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Is Gene-Size an Issue for the Diagnosis of Skeletal Muscle Disorders?Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough synonymous single nucleotide variants (sSNVs) do not alter the protein sequences, they have been shown to play an important role in human disease. Distinguishing pathogenic sSNVs from neutral ones is challenging because pathogenic sSNVs tend to have low prevalence. Although many methods have been developed for predicting the functional impact of single nucleotide variants, only a few have been specifically designed for identifying pathogenic sSNVs.
resultsIn this work, we describe a computational model, IDSV (Identification of Deleterious Synonymous Variants), which uses random forest (RF) to detect deleterious sSNVs in human genomes. We systematically investigate a total of 74 multifaceted features across seven categories: splicing, conservation, codon usage, sequence, pre-mRNA folding energy, translation efficiency, and function regions annotation features. Then, to remove redundant and irrelevant features and improve the prediction performance, feature selection is employed using the sequential backward selection method. Based on the optimized 10 features, a RF classifier is developed to identify deleterious sSNVs. The results on benchmark datasets show that IDSV outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in identifying sSNVs that are pathogenic.
conclusionsWe have developed an efficient feature-based prediction approach (IDSV) for deleterious sSNVs by using a wide variety of features. Among all the features, a compact and useful feature subset that has an important implication for identifying deleterious sSNVs is identified. Our results indicate that besides splicing and conservation features, a new translation efficiency feature is also an informative feature for identifying deleterious sSNVs. While the function regions annotation and sequence features are weakly informative, they may have the ability to discriminate deleterious sSNVs from benign ones when combined with other features. The data and source code are available on website http://bioinfo.ahu.edu.cn:8080/IDSV .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.