Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704447›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Study protocol for SeniorWorkingLife - push and stay mechanisms for labour market participation among older workers.

Lars Louis Andersen, Emil Sundstrup

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03634410 (SeniorWorkingLife), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03634410 unknown statusnot on this map

SeniorWorkingLife (Danish Title: SeniorArbejdsLiv)

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, DenmarkRan2018 to 2025Enrolled30,000ConditionsWork Related Upper Limb Disorder, Musculoskeletal Pain, Work Accident, Work Injury
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Barriers and Facilitators of Re-Employment among Senior Workers: Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Implication of Physically Demanding and Hazardous Work on Retirement Timing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. New Technology and Loss of Paid Employment among Older Workers: Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Do the Managers Think of Us? The Older-Worker-Perspective of Managers' Attitudes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lars Louis AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. lla@nrcwe.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-8085
Emil SundstrupNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to demographic changes across Europe there are strong political interests in maintaining the labour force by prolonging working life, i.e. increasing retirement age. This may pose both challenges and opportunities for societies, workplaces, and individuals. The SeniorWorkingLife (Danish: SeniorArbejdsLiv) project investigates push and stay mechanisms for labour market participation - now and in the future - among older workers (≥50 years).

methodsIn July 2018, 30,000 Danes age 50 or older (18,000 employed, 7000 unemployed, 3000 voluntary early retirements, 2000 disability pensions) were invited to participate, of which 15,721 (52.4%) replied to the entire questionnaire and 17,885 (59.6%) replied at least in part. Baseline data collection was terminated in October 2018. The questionnaire covers 14 domains in relation to push and stay mechanisms for labour market participation: 1) basic information (demographics, employment status etc.), 2) multiple-choice question covering a wide range of push and stay mechanisms, 3) role of the workplace, 4) age-discrimination, 5) personal economy, 6) possibility for voluntary early retirement among employed and unemployed, 7) gradual retirement, 8) competencies and continued education, 9) return-to-work, 10) new technologies at the workplace, 11) job satisfaction and well-being, 12) working environment, 13) lifestyle, 14) health and functional capacity. The project aspires to repeat the survey as a prospective cohort every 2-3 years and to perform longitudinal follow-up in Danish high-quality registers about work and health. DISCUSSION: The SeniorWorkingLife project will provide important knowledge about push and stay mechanisms for labour market participation among older workers. Push refers to mechanisms that increase the risk of premature exit from the labour marker, e.g. due to poor health, poor working environment, age discrimination, and stay to mechanisms prolonging working life e.g. due to attractive working conditions and a good working environment. The project will also to some degree investigate stuck, pull and jump mechanisms. Collaboration and use of the data for scientific purposes by other researchers are encouraged. Interested researchers should contact the corresponding author.

trial registrationRegistered as cohort study in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03634410 (August 16, 2018).

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDenmarkEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAgeingOccupational healthPublic healthSenior workerSustainable employmentWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID30704447
PMCPMC6357455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.