Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704401›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2019

Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Stefan J Schaller, Felix P Kappler, Claudia Hofberger, Jens Sattler, Richard Wagner, Gerhard Schneider, Manfred Blobner, Karl-Georg Kanz

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analgesia in adult trauma patients in physician-staffed Austrian helicopter rescue: a 12-year registry analysis.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan J SchallerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. s.schaller@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-9584
Felix P KapplerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claudia HofbergerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens SattlerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Richard WagnerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gerhard SchneiderKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Manfred BlobnerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Karl-Georg KanzKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough pain treatment is an important objective in prehospital emergency medicine the incidence of oligoanalgesia is still high in prehospital patients. Given that prehospital emergency medicine in Germany is open for physicians of any speciality, the prehospital pain treatment may differ depending on the primary medical education. Aim of this study was to explore the difference in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed emergency medical service.

methodsRetrospective single centre cohort analysis in a physician staffed ground based emergency medical service from January 2014 until December 2016. A total of 8882 consecutive emergency missions were screened. Primary outcome measure was the difference in application frequency of prehospital analgesics by anaesthesiologist or surgeon. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis including subgroup analysis for trauma and acute coronary syndrome.

resultsA total of 8238 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in the application frequency of analgesics between surgeons and anaesthesiologists especially for opioids (p < 0.001, OR 0.68 [0.56-0.82]). Fentanyl was the most common administered analgesic in the trauma subgroup, but significantly less common used by surgeons (p = 0.005, OR 0.63 [0.46-0.87]). In acute coronary syndrome cases there was no significant difference in morphine administration between anaesthesiologists and surgeons (p = 0.49, OR 0.88 [0.61-1.27]).

conclusionsIncreased training for prehospital pain treatment should be implemented, since opioids were administered notably less frequent by surgeons than by anaesthesiologists.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesiologistsCohort StudiesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFentanylGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain ManagementRetrospective StudiesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylEmergency physiciansPrehospital emergency medicinePrehospital pain management

Identifiers

PMID30704401
PMCPMC6357417
OpenAlexW2934148136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.