Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704375›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2018

"What matters to you?" A longitudinal qualitative study of Norwegian patients' perspectives on their pathways with colorectal cancer.

Frank Hansen, Gro K Rosvold Berntsen, Anita Salamonsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Motivational Interviewing is "Journal of patient experience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patient pathways as social drama: a qualitative study of cancer trajectories from the patient's perspective.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frank Hansena National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine , Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway.
Gro K Rosvold Berntsenb Primary care research group, Department of Community Medicine , Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-4263
Anita Salamonsend RKBU North - Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Faculty of Health Sciences , UiT the Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerson-centred care (PCC) is a well-acknowledged goal throughout the western world both within the health care services sector and for the patients themselves. To be able to create a future health care system that includes improved PCC, we need more in-depth knowledge of what matters to patients, how "what matters" might change over time, and tentative descriptions of commonalities across patients' perspectives. The aim of this study is to contribute to this knowledge base.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative interview series over one year with nine Norwegian patients who were recently diagnosed with rectal cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage I-III.

resultsWe found that: (1) patients have an initial focus on "biological goals" and conventional treatment; (2) pathways are unique and dynamic; (3) family and friends affected patient pathways positively with respect to meaningfulness and quality of life, but for some participants also negatively because there were heavy burdens of caretaking; (4) receiving help in the health care system depended on the patients' navigation skills; (5) pluralism in health-seeking behaviour was important in all patient pathways.

conclusionLong lasting illness may be a dynamic and complex journey. These results represent some features of a pathway with cancer and are important because they contribute with knowledge about what matters most seen from the cancer patients' point of view.

Indexed as

AttitudeDelivery of Health CareAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFamilyFemaleFriendsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchColorectal cancerillness trajectorieslongitudinal studypatient-centrednesspatient pathwaysperson-centred caresupportive cancer care

Identifiers

PMID30704375
PMCPMC6292341
OpenAlexW2904965534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.