Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704343›Full record

ReviewGut microbes2019

Exercise influence on the microbiome-gut-brain axis.

Alyssa Dalton, Christine Mermier, Micah Zuhl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of Intensity and Duration of Exercise on Gut Microbiota in Humans: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Interaction of physical activity and gut-brain axis: relevance for obesity.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alyssa DaltonDepartment of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Christine MermierDepartment of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Micah ZuhlDepartment of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque , NM , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome in the gut is a diverse environment, housing the majority of our bacterial microbes. This microecosystem has a symbiotic relationship with the surrounding multicellular organism, and a balance and diversity of specific phyla of bacteria support general health. When gut bacteria diversity diminishes, there are systemic consequences, such as gastrointestinal and psychological distress. This pathway of communication is known as the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Interventions such as probiotic supplementation that influence microbiome also improve both gut and brain disorders. Recent evidence suggests that aerobic exercise improves the diversity and abundance of genera from the

Indexed as

ExerciseBacteriaBrainFatty Acids, VolatileGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHumansProbioticsFatty Acids, VolatilebrainExercisegutmicrobiome–gut–brain axisprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID30704343
PMCPMC6748614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.