Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704135›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2019

Kundan Kumar, Fizza Askari, Mahima Sagar Sahu, Rupinder Kaur

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. EditingBiomolecules · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microbe Profile:Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kundan KumarLaboratory of Fungal Pathogenesis, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad 500039, India. kundankumar@cdfd.org.in.
Fizza AskariLaboratory of Fungal Pathogenesis, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad 500039, India. fizzaaskari@cdfd.org.in.
Mahima Sagar SahuLaboratory of Fungal Pathogenesis, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad 500039, India. mahimasagar@cdfd.org.in.
Rupinder KaurLaboratory of Fungal Pathogenesis, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad 500039, India. rkaur@cdfd.org.in.ORCID 0000-0003-3287-1700
Regional Centre for Biotechnology · INCentre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

DBT India Alliance IA/S/15/1/501831Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology BT/HRD/NBA/37/01/2014Science and Engineering Research Board EMR/2016/005375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

adherenceaspartyl proteasesbiofilm formationCandida glabratahost immune cellsstress response mechanismsyeast pathogens

Identifiers

PMID30704135
PMCPMC6407134
OpenAlexW2913634472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.