ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Assessment of Insulin-related Knowledge among Healthcare Professionals in a Large Teaching Hospital in the United Kingdom.
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination, Validation, and Development of Prediction Scores Related to Hypoglycemia Risk Factors Among Ambulatory Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Bali, Indonesia.Current diabetes reviews · 2026Article
- Insulin Injection Technique Education and Associated Knowledge Factors Among Physicians: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of insulin among diabetic patients and pharmacists in Egypt: "cross-sectional observational study".BMC medical education · 2024Observational
- Factors Influencing Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Outpatients with State Health Insurance at Regional General Hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Article
- Exploring Pakistani Physicians' Knowledge and Practices Regarding High Alert Medications: Findings and Implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Article
- Video-based health education to support insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus patients.Journal of public health research · 2020Article
- Improving the quality of insulin prescribing for people with diabetes being discharged from hospital.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite numerous strategies introduced to promote the safe use of insulin, insulin-related medication errors persist. Our aim was to examine the knowledge and self-reported confidence of a range of healthcare professionals regarding insulin use in a large teaching hospital in the North of England. A 16-item electronic questionnaire was prepared in light of locally reported insulin-related incidents and distributed electronically to all healthcare professionals at the hospital over a 4-week study period. A range of healthcare professionals, including nurses, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, junior doctors and consultants, completed the questionnaires (n = 109). Pharmacists achieved the greatest percentage of mean correct answers overall (49%), followed by consultant doctors (38%) and pharmacy technicians (37%), junior doctors (34%) and nurses (32%). Healthcare professionals were mainly "slightly confident" in their knowledge and use of insulin. Confidence level positively correlated to performance, but number of years' experience did not result in higher confidence or performance. This small-scale study allowed for a broad assessment of insulin-related topics that have been identified both nationally and locally as particularly problematic. Identifying knowledge gaps may help tailor strategies to help improve insulin knowledge and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.