Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704054›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2019

The Effects of Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulfate on Gut Microbial Composition: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Animal and Human Studies.

Anna Shmagel, Ryan Demmer, Daniel Knights, Mary Butler, Lisa Langsetmo, Nancy E Lane, Kristine Ensrud

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effects of inulin on gut microbial composition: a systematic review of evidence from human studies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna ShmagelDivision of Rheumatic and Autoimmune Diseases, the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. shmag002@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1945-9255
Ryan DemmerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. demm0009@umn.edu.
Daniel KnightsDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering and the Biotechnology Institute, the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. dknights@umn.edu.
Mary ButlerDivision of Health Policy and Management, the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. butl0092@umn.edu.
Lisa LangsetmoDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. langs005@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2245-1657
Nancy E LaneCenter for Musculoskeletal Health and Department of Medicine and Rheumatology, the University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. nelane@ucdavis.edu.
Kristine EnsrudDepartment of Medicine, the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. ensru001@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral glucosamine sulfate (GS) and chondroitin sulfate (CS), while widely marketed as joint-protective supplements, have limited intestinal absorption and are predominantly utilized by gut microbiota. Hence the effects of these supplements on the gut microbiome are of great interest, and may clarify their mode of action, or explain heterogeneity in therapeutic responses. We conducted a systematic review of animal and human studies reporting the effects of GS or CS on gut microbial composition. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for journal articles in English from database inception until July 2018, using search terms microbiome, microflora, intestinal microbiota/flora, gut microbiota/flora and glucosamine or chondroitin. Eight original articles reported the effects of GS or CS on microbiome composition in adult humans (four articles) or animals (four articles). Studies varied significantly in design, supplementation protocols, and microbiome assessment methods. There was moderate-quality evidence for an association between CS exposure and increased abundance of genus

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaChondroitin SulfatesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGlucosamineHumansChondroitin SulfatesGlucosaminechondroitinglucosaminemicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID30704054
PMCPMC6412843
OpenAlexW2914327061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.