Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704039›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2019

The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Erola Astó, Iago Méndez, Sergi Audivert, Andreu Farran-Codina, Jordi Espadaler

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Preventive effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  15. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cells · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erola AstóAB-Biotics, S.A., ESADE Creapolis, Av. Torre Blanca, 57, Sant Cugat del Vallès, E-08172 Barcelona, Spain. asto@ab-biotics.com.
Iago MéndezAB-Biotics, S.A., ESADE Creapolis, Av. Torre Blanca, 57, Sant Cugat del Vallès, E-08172 Barcelona, Spain. mendez@ab-biotics.com.
Sergi AudivertAB-Biotics, S.A., ESADE Creapolis, Av. Torre Blanca, 57, Sant Cugat del Vallès, E-08172 Barcelona, Spain. sergi@ab-biotics.com.
Andreu Farran-CodinaDepartment of Nutrition, Food Science, and Gastronomy, XaRTA ⁻ INSA, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Campus de l'Alimentació de Torribera, Av. Prat de la Riba, 171, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, E-08921 Barcelona, Spain. afarran@ub.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1254-7110
Jordi EspadalerAB-Biotics, S.A., ESADE Creapolis, Av. Torre Blanca, 57, Sant Cugat del Vallès, E-08172 Barcelona, Spain. espadaler@ab-biotics.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0128-8363
AB-Biotics (Spain) · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Departament d'Economia i Coneixement, Generalitat de Catalunya 2014 DI 073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of probiotics, fructan-type prebiotics, and synbiotics in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) show significant heterogeneity in methodology and results. Here, we study the efficacy of such interventions and the reasons for the heterogeneity of their results. Eligible random controlled trials were collected from the PUBMED and SCOPUS databases. A total of 18 placebo-controlled and active treatment-controlled (i.e., mesalazine) studies were selected with a Jadad score ≥ 3, including 1491 patients with UC. Data for prebiotics and synbiotics were sparse and consequently these studies were excluded from the meta-analysis. The UC remission efficacy of probiotics was measured in terms of relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR). Significant effects were observed in patients with active UC whenever probiotics containing bifidobacteria were used, or when adopting the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended scales (UC Disease Activity Index and Disease Activity Index). By the FDA recommended scales, the RR was 1.55 (CI95%: 1.13⁻2.15,

Indexed as

PrebioticsSynbioticsColitis, UlcerativeFructansHumansProbioticsRemission InductionFructansPrebioticsprebioticprobioticremissionsynbioticulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID30704039
PMCPMC6412539
OpenAlexW2914214743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.