Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30704035›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Challenges and Contradictions of Metal Nano-Particle Applications for Radio-Sensitivity Enhancement in Cancer Therapy.

Eva Pagáčová, Lenka Štefančíková, Franz Schmidt-Kaler, Georg Hildenbrand, Tomáš Vičar, Daniel Depeš, Jin-Ho Lee, Felix Bestvater, Sandrine Lacombe, Erika Porcel and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eva PagáčováCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. pagacova@ibp.cz.
Lenka ŠtefančíkováCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. StefancikovaL@seznam.cz.
Franz Schmidt-KalerKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. franzschmidtkaler@web.de.
Georg HildenbrandKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. hilden@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1992-6025
Tomáš VičarBrno University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technická 3082/12, 61600 Brno, Czech Republic. tomasvicar@gmail.com.
Daniel DepešCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. depesd26@gmail.com.
Jin-Ho LeeKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. jin-ho.lee@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.
Felix BestvaterGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. f.bestvater@dkfz.de.
Sandrine LacombeInstitute des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France. sandrine.lacombe@u-psud.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3334-9201
Erika PorcelInstitute des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France. erika.porcel@u-psud.fr.
Stéphane RouxInstitute UTINAM, UMR CNRS 6213-Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25020 Besançon Cedex, France. stephane.roux@univ-fcomte.fr.
Frederik WenzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68159 Mannheim, Germany. Frederik.Wenz@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Olga KopečnáCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. kopecna@ibp.cz.
Iva FalkováCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. ivafalk@ibp.cz.
Michael HausmannKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. hausmann@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9430-1987
Martin FalkCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. falk@ibp.cz.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics · CZHeidelberg University · DEUniversité Paris-Sud · FRBrno University of Technology · CZCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 16-12454SMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky 16-29835Universität Heidelberg Mobility Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the very beginnings of radiotherapy, a crucial question persists with how to target the radiation effectiveness into the tumor while preserving surrounding tissues as undamaged as possible. One promising approach is to selectively pre-sensitize tumor cells by metallic nanoparticles. However, though the "physics" behind nanoparticle-mediated radio-interaction has been well elaborated, practical applications in medicine remain challenging and often disappointing because of limited knowledge on biological mechanisms leading to cell damage enhancement and eventually cell death. In the present study, we analyzed the influence of different nanoparticle materials (platinum (Pt), and gold (Au)), cancer cell types (HeLa, U87, and SKBr3), and doses (up to 4 Gy) of low-Linear Energy Transfer (LET) ionizing radiation (γ- and X-rays) on the extent, complexity and reparability of radiation-induced γH2AX + 53BP1 foci, the markers of double stand breaks (DSBs). Firstly, we sensitively compared the focus presence in nuclei during a long period of time post-irradiation (24 h) in spatially (three-dimensionally, 3D) fixed cells incubated and non-incubated with Pt nanoparticles by means of high-resolution immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. The data were compared with our preliminary results obtained for Au nanoparticles and recently published results for gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticles of approximately the same size (2⁻3 nm). Next, we introduced a novel super-resolution approach-single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM)-to study the internal structure of the repair foci. In these experiments, 10 nm Au nanoparticles were used that could be also visualized by SMLM. Altogether, the data show that different nanoparticles may or may not enhance radiation damage to DNA, so multi-parameter effects have to be considered to better interpret the radiosensitization. Based on these findings, we discussed on conclusions and contradictions related to the effectiveness and presumptive mechanisms of the cell radiosensitization by nanoparticles. We also demonstrate that SMLM offers new perspectives to study internal structures of repair foci with the goal to better evaluate potential differences in DNA damage patterns.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageGadoliniumGoldHeLa CellsHumansMetal NanoparticlesMicroscopy, ConfocalGadoliniumGoldcancer radiotherapydamage to lysosomesDNA damageDNA double strand breaks (DSBs)DNA repairDNA repair focimetal nanoparticlessingle-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM)super-resolution microscopytumor cell radiosensitization

Identifiers

PMID30704035
PMCPMC6387067
OpenAlexW2913906966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.