Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30703838›Full record

ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2019

[Acute Respiratory Tract Infections/Acute Bronchitis].

Björn Kleibrink, Christian Taube

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Björn KleibrinkKlinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Westdeutsches Lungenzentrum am Universitätsklinikum Essen.
Christian TaubeKlinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Westdeutsches Lungenzentrum am Universitätsklinikum Essen.
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory tract infections and acute bronchitis are one of the major indications for which antibiotics are prescribed. As most of respiratory tract infections are caused by viruses and antibiotic therapy is rarely indicated. Reasons for the unnecessary prescription of antibiotics in this patient population are false expectations regarding the course and duration of common cold symptoms and especially coughing. After exclusion of severe diseases acute coughing should be treated with a symptom-oriented therapy. There is no reliable data on the use of antibiotic therapy in patient groups with an increased risk for severe complications. Studies on the use of laboratory makers to identify persons with bacterial infections who might benefit from antibiotic therapy and to reduce unnecessary prescriptions have been negative for CRP and inconclusive for procalcitonin. Peer-review and delayed prescribing could be demonstrated to reduce the rate of unneeded antibiotic prescriptions. Most of the symptomatic therapies employed for cough and the common cold are not studied in methodologically sound randomized controlled trials. The most common expectorants used in Germany are Ambroxol and N-Acetylcytein. For both substances there is little data supporting a benefit in patients with an acute bronchitis. Antitussiva reduce the symptom burden, but there is also a strong placebo-effect on the cough reflex.

Indexed as

BronchitisRespiratory Tract InfectionsAcute DiseaseAnti-Bacterial AgentsGermanyHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30703838
PMCPMC7117072
OpenAlexW3022054029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.