ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2019
[Acute Respiratory Tract Infections/Acute Bronchitis].
Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Qingke Pingchuan granules as adjuvant therapy for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute exacerbation asthma, and acute bronchitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- An Epidemiological Study on the Effectiveness of Nasturtium Herb and Horseradish Root (AngocinAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prescription of EPs 7630 is associated with short- and long-term benefits in acute bronchitis: a real-world data analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Investigation into the Effectiveness of an Herbal Combination (AngocinAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory tract infections and acute bronchitis are one of the major indications for which antibiotics are prescribed. As most of respiratory tract infections are caused by viruses and antibiotic therapy is rarely indicated. Reasons for the unnecessary prescription of antibiotics in this patient population are false expectations regarding the course and duration of common cold symptoms and especially coughing. After exclusion of severe diseases acute coughing should be treated with a symptom-oriented therapy. There is no reliable data on the use of antibiotic therapy in patient groups with an increased risk for severe complications. Studies on the use of laboratory makers to identify persons with bacterial infections who might benefit from antibiotic therapy and to reduce unnecessary prescriptions have been negative for CRP and inconclusive for procalcitonin. Peer-review and delayed prescribing could be demonstrated to reduce the rate of unneeded antibiotic prescriptions. Most of the symptomatic therapies employed for cough and the common cold are not studied in methodologically sound randomized controlled trials. The most common expectorants used in Germany are Ambroxol and N-Acetylcytein. For both substances there is little data supporting a benefit in patients with an acute bronchitis. Antitussiva reduce the symptom burden, but there is also a strong placebo-effect on the cough reflex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.