Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30703685›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2019

Alternative splicing of neuronal genes: new mechanisms and new therapies.

Diane Lipscombe, Eduardo Javier Lopez Soto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cell-type-resolvedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CaeLife · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. circRNA fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Profile ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diane LipscombeRobert J and Nancy D Carney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Electronic address: diane_lipscombe@brown.edu.
Eduardo Javier Lopez SotoRobert J and Nancy D Carney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Funding

Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in Nociceptors and MechanoreceptorsR01NS055251 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSCOMBE, DIANE · 2006 to 2025
$9.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic changes in alternative splicing during the life cycle of neurons support development and plasticity, and are implicated in disease pathology. Cell-specific alternative splicing programs coordinate exon selection across networks of functionally connected genes. In this opinion piece, we highlight recent publications that identify some of the molecular mechanisms-RNA and DNA binding proteins and epigenetic modifications-which direct cell-specific exon selection during pre-mRNA splicing. Aberrant splicing patterns are signature features of a growing number of diseases of the nervous system. Recent publications demonstrate the value of delineating basic mechanisms that dictate exon choice to inform the development of new therapeutic strategies that correct or compensate for damaging deficits in alternative splicing.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingNeuronsExonsRNA Splicing

Identifiers

PMID30703685
PMCPMC6629480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.