Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30703191›Full record

ArticleJAMA facial plastic surgery2019

Utility of Indocyanine Green Angiography to Identify Clinical Factors Associated With Perfusion of Paramedian Forehead Flaps During Nasal Reconstruction Surgery.

Mohamed Abdelwahab, Cherian K Kandathil, Sam P Most, Emily A Spataro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA facial plastic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Applications of intraoperative angiography in head and neck reconstruction.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed AbdelwahabDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Cherian K KandathilDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Sam P MostDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Emily A SpataroDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USMansoura University · EGWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIdentifying factors affecting forehead flap neovascularization during nasal reconstruction surgical procedures using quantitative dynamics of fluorescence from indocyanine green angiography may be associated with reduced vascular complications.

objectivesTo identify quantifiable forehead flap perfusion measures using indocyanine green angiography during nasal reconstruction procedures and to evaluate clinical factors associated with neovascularization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective cohort study of 71 patients at a tertiary referral center of Stanford University, Stanford, California, between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2018, undergoing forehead flap nasal reconstruction surgery with flap perfusion assessed by indocyanine green angiography. EXPOSURES: Indocyanine green angiography was performed intraoperatively to record forehead flap neovascularization during the second stage of nasal reconstruction surgery after temporary clamping of the pedicle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: With use of quantifiable data of fluorescence dynamics, flap perfusion in association with a reference point in the cheek after pedicle clamping was assessed by 2 methods: (1) ingress (arterial inflow) and egress (venous outflow) flap-to-cheek ratio and (2) flap-to-cheek perfusion (fluorescence) ratio at 3 time points (midpoint of indocyanine green flap inflow, maximum fluorescence [peak], and midpoint of indocyanine green flap outflow) and their calculated mean. Association of the perfusion measures with patient and procedural factors was performed using linear regression models.

resultsOf the 71 patients included in the study, 43 (61%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 71.1 (11.0) years. The mean (SD) flap-to-cheek inflow ratio was 0.48 (0.40), peak fluorescence ratio was 0.59 (0.34), and outflow ratio was 0.88 (0.42). The calculated mean (SD) flap-to-cheek perfusion ratio of these measures was 0.65 (0.35). The mean (SD) flap-to-cheek ingress ratio was 0.54 (0.36) and egress ratio was 0.65 (0.98). With use of a multivariable regression model, the time between stages was positively associated with flap-to-cheek ingress ratio (β, 0.015; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.030), and cartilage grafting was negatively associated with flap-to-cheek outflow ratio (β, -0.240; 95% CI, -0.472 to -0.008). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that indocyanine green angiography is an effective method to quantify relative neovascularization perfusion of forehead flaps. Future applications may include the use of this technology to aid in early flap division and ensure adequate perfusion among high-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PhysiologicAgedAngiographyFemaleForeheadHumansIndocyanine GreenMaleNasal Surgical ProceduresPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID30703191
PMCPMC6537837
OpenAlexW2911591023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.