Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30703190›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2019

Effect of Adding Docetaxel to Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Primary Local Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Stéphane Oudard, Igor Latorzeff, Armelle Caty, Laurent Miglianico, Emmanuel Sevin, Anne Claire Hardy-Bessard, Remy Delva, Frédéric Rolland, Loic Mouret, Franck Priou and 18 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00764166 (Non-Metastatic High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Relapse Only After Local Treatment. A Prospective Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Hormonal Therapy +/-Docetaxel), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00764166 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Non-Metastatic High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Relapse Only After Local Treatment. A Prospective Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Hormonal Therapy +/-Docetaxel

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2003 to 2010Enrolled254ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the ProstateArmsDocetaxel + hormonal treatment (LH-RH agonist), Hormonal treatment (LH-RH agonist)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptomic and clinical heterogeneity of metastatic disease timing within metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Stéphane OudardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Igor LatorzeffDepartment of Oncology Radiotherapy, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Armelle CatyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Galilée, Hôpital Privé la Louvière, Lille, France.
Laurent MiglianicoDepartment of Oncology Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Privé St Grégoire, Rennes, France.
Emmanuel SevinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Anne Claire Hardy-BessardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor, Plérin, France.
Remy DelvaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France.
Frédéric RollandDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, St Herblain, France.
Loic MouretDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Franck PriouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Philippe BeuzebocDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Gwenaelle GravisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Claude LinassierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Philippe GomezDepartment of Oncology Radiotherapy, Centre Joliot Curie, Rouen, France.
Eric VoogDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinique Victor Hugo, Institut Inter-régional de Cancérologie, Le Mans, France.
Xavier MuraccioleDepartment of Oncology Radiotherapy, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
Christine AbrahamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Versailles André Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
Eugeniu BanuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Jean-Marc FerreroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Alain RavaudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital St Andre, Bordeaux, France.
Ivan KrakowskiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France.
Jean-Léon LagrangeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.
Gaël DeplanqueDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondation Hopital St Joseph, Paris, France.
David ZylberaitDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Compiegne, Compiegne, France.
Laurence BozecDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Nadine HouedeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
Stéphane CulineDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital St Louis, Paris, France.
Reza ElaidiAssociation pour la Recherche sur les Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie, Paris, France.
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRAssociation pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie · FRBretonneau Hospital · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre de Radiothérapie Bayard · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRCentre Hospitalier Compiègne-Noyon · FRCentre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée · FRCentre Hospitalier privé Saint Grégoire · FRClinique Pasteur · FRClinique Victor Hugo · FRDélégation Centre-Est · FRHôpital André Mignot · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital Européen · FRHôpital Foch · FRHôpital Saint-André · FRHôpital Saint Joseph · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInstitut Bergonié · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAndrogen-deprivation therapy (ADT) plus docetaxel is the standard of care in hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer but is of uncertain benefit in a nonmetastatic, high-risk prostate cancer setting.

objectiveTo assess the benefit of ADT plus docetaxel in patients presenting with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after primary local therapy and high-risk factors but no evidence of metastatic disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis open-label, phase 3, randomized superiority trial comparing ADT plus docetaxel vs ADT alone enrolled patients from 28 centers in France between June 4, 2003, and September 25, 2007; final follow-up was conducted April 12, 2017, and analysis was performed May 2 to July 31, 2017. Patients had undergone primary local therapy for prostate cancer, were experiencing rising PSA levels, and were considered to be at high risk of metastatic disease. Stratification was by prior local therapy and PSA-level doubling time (≤6 vs >6 months), and intention-to-treat analysis was used.

interventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive ADT (1 year) plus docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks [6 cycles]), or ADT alone (1 year). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). Secondary end points were PSA response, radiologic PFS, overall survival, safety, and quality of life.

resultsOverall, 254 patients were randomized (1:1) to the trial; median age, 64 years in the ADT plus docetaxel arm, 66 years in the ADT alone arm. At a median follow-up of 30.0 months, the median PSA-PFS was 20.3 (95% CI, 19.0-21.6) months in the ADT plus docetaxel arm vs 19.3 (95% CI, 18.2-20.8) months in the ADT alone arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.16; P = .31). At a median follow-up of 10.5 years, there was no significant between-arm difference in radiologic PFS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.43; P = .88). Overall survival data were not mature. The most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects in the ADT plus docetaxel arm were neutropenia (60 of 125 patients [48.0%]), febrile neutropenia (10 [8.0%]), and thrombocytopenia (4 [3.0%]). There was no significant between-arm difference in overall quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with ADT alone, combined ADT plus docetaxel therapy with curative intent did not significantly improve PSA-PFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and rising PSA levels and no evidence of metastatic disease.

trial registrationFrench Health Products Safety Agency identifier: 030591; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00764166.

Indexed as

AgedAndrogen AntagonistsAnilidesAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDocetaxelHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesProgression-Free SurvivalProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRiskAndrogen AntagonistsAnilidesAntineoplastic AgentsbicalutamideDocetaxelNitrilesProstate-Specific AntigenTosyl CompoundsTriptorelin Pamoate

Identifiers

PMID30703190
PMCPMC6512307
OpenAlexW2913190011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.