Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30703162›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Hand grip strength: Reference values for adults and elderly people of Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.

Cledir Araújo Amaral, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Amaral, Gina Torres Rego Monteiro, Mauricio Teixeira Leite Vasconcellos, Margareth Crisóstomo Portela

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06688266 (Comparative Effects of Nerve Gliding Exercises and Conventional Grip Strength Exercises on Grip Strength, Range of Motion and Performance of Cricket Batters), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06688266 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Nerve Gliding Exercises and Conventional Grip Strength Exercises on Grip Strength, Range of Motion and Performance of Cricket Batters

TypeinterventionalSponsorSehat Medical ComplexRan2024 to 2025Enrolled34ConditionsNerve CompressionArmsNerve Gliding Exercises, Hand Grip Strength Exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cledir Araújo AmaralFederal Institute of Acre, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7221-5364
Thatiana Lameira Maciel AmaralCenter for Health Sciences and Sports, Federal University of Acre, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-5633
Gina Torres Rego MonteiroDepartment of Epidemiological and Quantitative Methods in Health, National School of Public Health Sergio Arouca, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mauricio Teixeira Leite VasconcellosNational School of Statistical Sciences, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Margareth Crisóstomo PortelaDepartment of Health Administration and Planning, National School of Public Health Sergio Arouca, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BRBrazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics · BRInstituto Federal do Acre · BRUniversidade Federal do Acre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hand grip strength (HGS) is recognized as an important health indicator, but validated reference values that can be applied to the evaluation of individuals in different populations are still lacking. This work aimed to identify correlations between HGS and anthropometric variables and to establish HGS reference values for adult and elderly populations. This is a population-based cross-sectional study considering the subsets of individuals with healthy right or left upper limbs from a sample of 1,609 adults and elderly residents in Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil. Descriptive statistics of anthropometric measures and HGS values at maximum performance based on three measurements of the two hands were obtained, and Pearson correlations between these variables were applied. Percentile distributions were estimated for right and left HGS by sex and age group. Men presented, in general, a maximum HGS 57% higher than women (43.4 kg vs. 27.6 kg), and also higher HGS levels in the different age groups. In both sexes, the highest HGS values were observed in the age group of 30 to 39 years (men, 46.9 kg; women, 29.4 kg), with a subsequent decline. HGS presented a negative correlation with age and a weak to moderate positive correlation with anthropometric variables, among men and women. The median HGS of men was reduced by about 46% between the ages of 30 and 39 years and 80 years and over (right hand, 46.4 to 23.7 kg; left hand, 42.2 to 23.5 kg) and by about 44% in women (right hand, 29.0 to 16.4 kg, left hand, 27.3 to 15.2 kg). The values identified are a reference for HGS behavior among healthy adults and seniors, although they do not discriminate individuals with specific health conditions. They can be used in rehabilitation programs and subsidize future studies aimed at exploring their potential application in the evaluation of the health condition of adults and elderly individuals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30703162
PMCPMC6354998
OpenAlexW2914205341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.