Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30702970›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Comprehensive Paired Tumor/Germline Testing for Lynch Syndrome: Bringing Resolution to the Diagnostic Process.

Monalyn U Salvador, Melissa R F Truelson, Carla Mason, Beth Souders, Holly LaDuca, Brittany Dougall, Mary Helen Black, Kelly Fulk, Jessica Profato, Stephanie Gutierrez and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Lynch Syndrome: Its Impact on Urothelial Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Tumor-Based Genetic Testing and Familial Cancer Risk.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Monalyn U Salvador1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Melissa R F Truelson1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Carla Mason1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Beth Souders1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Holly LaDuca1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Brittany Dougall1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Mary Helen Black1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Kelly Fulk1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Jessica Profato1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Stephanie Gutierrez1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Kory Jasperson1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Brigette Tippin-Davis1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Hsiao-Mei Lu1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Phillip Gray1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Swati Shah1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Elizabeth C Chao1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Negar Ghahramani1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Megan Landsverk1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Chia-Ling Gau1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Daniel Chen1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Melissa Pronold1 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current diagnostic testing algorithm for Lynch syndrome (LS) is complex and often involves multiple follow-up germline and somatic tests. We aimed to describe the results of paired tumor/germline testing performed on a large cohort of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) to better determine the utility of this novel testing methodology. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients with CRC and EC undergoing paired tumor/germline analysis of the LS genes at a clinical diagnostic laboratory (N = 702). Microsatellite instability, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, and germline testing of additional genes were performed if ordered. Patients were assigned to one of five groups on the basis of prior tumor screening and germline testing outcomes. Results for each group are described.

resultsOverall results were informative regarding an LS diagnosis for 76.1% and 60.8% of patients with mismatch-repair-deficient (MMRd) CRC and EC without and with prior germline testing, respectively. LS germline mutations were identified in 24.8% of patients in the group without prior germline testing, and interestingly, in 9.5% of patients with previous germline testing; four of these were discordant with prior tumor screening. Upon excluding patients with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and germline mutations, biallelic somatic inactivation was seen in approximately 50% of patients with MMRd tumors across groups.

conclusionPaired testing identified a cause for MMRd tumors in 76% and 61% of patients without and with prior LS germline testing, respectively. Findings support inclusion of tumor sequencing as well as comprehensive LS germline testing in the LS testing algorithm. Paired testing offers a complete, convenient evaluation for LS with high diagnostic resolution.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationDNA Mutational AnalysisGerm-Line MutationMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1Predictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, TumorMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1

Identifiers

PMID30702970
PMCPMC6494248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.