Observational studyMedicine2019
Factors related to the size of venous leg ulcers: A cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are an important health problem, and the size of ulcers often affects patient care, healing time, and quality of life. However, the risk factors associated with ulcer size have been rarely reported. The aim of this study was to establish the risk factors for the size of venous ulceration by analyzing the patient demographics and the results of duplex ultrasonography.This study was an in-patient population-based cross-sectional study conducted at a single center during the period from 2013 to 2017. Men and women aged >18 years, who consecutively presented to our hospital with VLU, were included. According to the size of the ulcer, patients were divided into two groups, those with ulcers≤2 cm and those with ulcers >2 cm. Demographic, anthropometric, and clinical data were collected. For the analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used.A total of 232 patients with VLUs were admitted to our hospital from 2013 to 2017, including 117 patients (50.4%) with ulcer diameters ≤2 cm and 115 patients (49.6%) with ulcer diameters >2 cm. According to the results of the multivariate analysis, the ulcer duration (P = .001), the diameter of perforating veins (PVs) around the ulcers (P = .025), the reflux time of common femoral veins (CFVs) (P = .013), the reflux time of great saphenous veins (GSVs) (P = .021), and the reflux time of PVs around the ulcers (P = .001) were independent risk factors for VLUs.These findings provide evidence that the size of VLU was significantly related to the ulcer duration, the diameter of PV around the ulcers, the CFV reflux time, the GSV reflux time, and the PV reflux time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.