ArticleMedicine2019
How international are the editorial boards of leading spine journals? A STROBE-compliant study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing global inequities in radiology research: a multi-level analysis of research output.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Power imbalances in tropical medicine journals: an analysis of editorial board representation.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
- Composition of the editorial staff of major spinal journals based on geo-economic background: A survey analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Disparities in paediatric radiology research publications from low- and lower middle-income countries: a time for change.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Analyzing the composition of the editorial boards in high-impact medical ethics journals: a survey study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Underrepresentation of Low- and Middle-Income Nations in Ophthalmology Journals: A Critical Analysis on Diversity, Equity, and Global Representation.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- How international are the editorial boards in the field of hand research? A cross-sectional study of leading subspecialty hand journals.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion on Editorial Boards of Global Health Journals.Asian bioethics review · 2023Article
- Exclusion of the non-English-speaking world from the scientific literature: Recommendations for change for addiction journals and publishers.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2023Article
- Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia.Research integrity and peer review · 2022Article
- Association of International Editorial Staff With Published Articles From Low- and Middle-Income Countries.JAMA network open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low- and middle-income countries contribute to only a small percentage of publications in multiple medical fields. Editorial bias was reported to be an important reason for this. However, whether this trend exists in leading spine journals remains unclear. This study determined the composition of the editorial boards of leading spine journals and analyzed the international representation of editorial boards.The editorial board members of four leading subspecialty spine journals, including The Spine Journal, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, European Spine Journal, and Spine were identified from the journals' websites. The countries of editorial board members were identified and analyzed according to the continent and country income categories classified by the World Bank.A total of 608 editorial board members were identified from the four leading spine journals. The majority (91.4%) of editorial board members were from high-income countries, followed by upper-middle income countries (7.2%), and lower-middle income countries (1.3%). No editorial board members were from low-income countries. Regarding the continent of residence, 46.5% of the editorial board members were from North America, followed by Europe (38.5%), Asia (9.9%), South America (2.8%), Oceania (1.6%), and Africa (0.7%). The editorial board members came from 40 different countries, which were concentrated in North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. The largest number of editorial board members came from the United States (42.3%), followed by Germany (6.9%), the United Kingdom (6.7%), Switzerland (5.8%), and Italy (5.1%).A lack of international representation on editorial boards exists in leading spine journals. Editorial board members from high-income countries are substantially overrepresented, while editorial board members from low- and middle-income countries are severely underrepresented. The United States is the most represented country on the editorial boards of leading spine journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.