Observational studyMedicine2019
Rheumatoid factor as predictor of response to treatment with anti-TNF alpha drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a cohort study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lack of association between rheumatoid factor levels and clinical response to certolizumab pegol in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study.Drugs in context · 2026Article
- Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1 as a Therapeutic Target for Inflammatory Diseases.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Influence of Rheumatoid Factors on the Efficacy of TNF Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Circulating exo-miRNA-27a-5p is a novel biomarker of the tofacitinib treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Anti-arthritis Effect of Anti-chitinase-3-like 1 Antibody Through Inhibition of MMP3.Immune network · 2025Article
- Rheumatoid factors revisited in the age of biologic therapy.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Rheumatoid Factor: Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Defining immune cell phenotypes that distinguish treatment responders and non-responders in RA.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Review
- Triple positivity for autoantibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a severe course of the disease but not with bone turnover markers.Reumatologia · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Anti-TNFα Agents: The Example of Ozoralizumab.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024Review
- Forty-Eight-Month Monitoring of Disease Activity in Patients with Long-Standing Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with TNF-α Inhibitors: Time for Clinical Outcome Prediction and Biosimilar vs Biologic Originator Performance.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Observational
- Anti-Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4 Autoantibodies and Disease Duration as Predictors of Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis.ACR open rheumatology · 2024Article
- Influence of rheumatoid factor levels and TNF inhibitor structure on secondary nonresponse in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Rheumatoid factor titers, but not Fc fragments, may be strongly associated with drug survival of anti-TNF agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2024Article
- Commentary on Cohen et al.: Role of Clinical Factors in Precision Medicine Test to Predict Nonresponse to TNFi Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Differential efficacy of TNF inhibitors with or without the immunoglobulin fragment crystallizable (Fc) portion in rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Causes of the Failure of Biological Therapy at a Tertiary Center: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2021Article
- Prevalence and relevant factors of positive RF in brucellosis patients with arthralgia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- ACPA Status Correlates with Differential Immune Profile in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Cells · 2021Article
- Efficacy, retention, and safety of tofacitinib in real-life: Hur-bio monocentric experienceTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We determined whether rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) can predict remission or severe disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha drugs.We performed a cohort study based on the clinical data from a referral center for the treatment of RA in Bogotá, Colombia, were included patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of RA with an active disease and for whom a treatment scheme was begun with anti-TNF alpha medication, with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months. Disease activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis was assessed through measurement of RF, ACPA, disease activity score (DAS28), and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). We calculated the incidence rates (IRs) for remission and severe disability. We also calculated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for each outcome by adjusting for possible confounders using the Poisson regression method. The hypothesis was tested with a P value of <.05. Statistical analysis was performed in Stata 15.We included 400 patients receiving an anti-TNF alpha agent. Median age was 60 years, and 322 patients were women (80.5%). RF was positive in 357 patients (89%), ACPA in 348 patients (87%), and co-positivity in 324 patients (81%). Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 12-79 months). The IR for remission was 23 per 100 person-years in RF-negative patients and 16 per 100 person-years in RF-positive patients. The adjusted IRR (age sex, treatment, and ACPA) was 1.51 (95%CI, 1.05-2.18). The IR for severe disability was 10.8 per 100 person-years in the RF-positive cohort and 2.3 per 100 person-years in the RF-negative cohort. The IRR adjusted for these factors was 4.37 (95%CI, 1.6-12). Co-positivity had a similar behavior to RF. No differences were recorded in the rates of remission or disability in ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients.Our findings suggest that remission is less frequent and severe disability more frequent in RF-positive patients treated with anti-TNF alpha agents than in RF-negative patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.