ArticleMedicine2019
Effect of Dahuang Danpi Decoction on Lactobacillus bulgaricus growth and metabolism: In vitro study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gut flora plays an essential role in disease and health. A traditional Chinese herb formula, Dahuang Danpi Decoction (DDD) can alleviate several gastrointestinal diseases.In the present study, we assessed the effect of DDD on the growth and metabolism of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. L bulgaricus was cultured in MRS with 40 mg/ml (high), 10 mg/ml (medium), and 2.5 mg/ml (low) of DDD, Ceftriaxone and blank (control). The growth of L bulgaricus was measured by optical density. The levels of L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid were also measured.Compared to the control group, the concentrations of L bulgaricus in the medium and the high concentrations DDD groups were significantly higher (P < .001 for all), while the concentrations of L bulgaricus in the ceftriaxone groups were significantly lower. In the 3 DDD groups, the L- lactic acid levels were significantly higher than those in the control group and the ceftriaxone groups (P < .001 for all), and the L-lactic acid level was the highest in the high DDD group. Similarly, the D-lactic acid level in the high concentration DDD group was significantly higher than those in the medium and low concentration DDD groups, the control group and the ceftriaxone groups. Both the L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid levels were lower than those in the control group and the DDD groups.DDD could dose-dependently promote the growth of L bulgaricus and enhance the secretion of L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid, which suggests DDD may be able to interact with the probiotics, improve the gut microbiota, and serve in the prevention and treatment of dysbiosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.