ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2020
Understanding adolescent and parent acceptability and feasibility experience in a large Type 1 diabetes mellitus behavioural trial.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences and perspectives of children and adolescents participating in pediatric clinical trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsUsing an 18-month, multisite randomized control trial as an exemplar, the aim of this study was to identify themes related to adolescent and parental feasibility and acceptability for participation in large behavioural trials designed to improve adolescents' Type 1 diabetes self-management.
methodsThematic analysis methodology was used to develop themes describing factors related to acceptability and feasibility.
resultsBased on a sample of interviews (N = 72), factors contributing to intervention acceptability and feasibility were identified. Aspects of acceptability included: a framework for goal-setting, the coach as a non-judgemental listener, perception of an ongoing benefit to participation and the delivery mode. Aspects of feasibility included: participants' altruism to help adolescents with Type 1 diabetes; pre-enrolment preparation for intervention content and duration; and the option of remote intervention delivery via telephone or video, which minimized travel time and costs. In addition, participants described positive outcomes including improvements in behaviour, Type 1 diabetes self-management behaviours and parent-adolescent communication, and emotion-attitude changes. Participants also described potential revisions that may inform future trials.
conclusionsAcceptability and feasibility of behavioural interventions with adolescents with chronic illness have multifactorial dimensions. While empowering adolescent self-management, parental support is also an under-appreciated aspect to consider. Potential revisions were identified for subsequent behavioural trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.