Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701442›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2019

The metabolic syndrome and its components as prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Melissa Reed, Caitlyn Patrick, Brianna Croft, Natalie Walde, Ioannis A Voutsadakis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic syndrome and gastrointestinal cancers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa ReedClinical Trials Unit, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Caitlyn PatrickClinical Trials Unit, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Brianna CroftClinical Trials Unit, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie WaldeClinical Trials Unit, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Ioannis A VoutsadakisAlgoma District Cancer Program, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6B 0A8, Canada. ivoutsadakis@yahoo.com.
Sault Area Hospital · CAEssar Steel Algoma (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComponents of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) are involved in colorectal cancer development and the incidence of the disease is higher in obese and diabetic patients. Nevertheless, the value of these diseases or the MetS as a whole as prognostic markers once colorectal cancer is diagnosed is controversial.

methodsPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in our center over a 6-year period were reviewed and data on baseline characteristics of the patients and their cancers were extracted. Data on the presence and pharmacologic treatments of the four components of the MetS (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) were also recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), Kaplan-Meier curves of the various groups were constructed and compared with the log-rank test.

resultsOne hundred and twenty-three patients were included in the analysis. The prevalence of the four MetS components was 66.1% for overweight/obesity, 25.2% for diabetes, 61% for hypertension, and 41.5% for dyslipidemia. Among the four components of the metabolic syndrome, none was associated with either PFS or OS. Diabetes tended to approach significance for PFS (p = 0.08). The MetS as a whole did not influence survival outcome. MetS was not prognostic even if the overweight category was not considered as a positive element of the syndrome.

conclusionThese data suggest that diabetes or other metabolic syndrome elements are not prognostic factors for PFS or OS in metastatic colorectal cancer. Further investigation may be warranted with a focus on refinement of the metabolic evaluation.

Indexed as

Progression-Free SurvivalAdenocarcinomaAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDiabetes MellitusDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedObesityPrevalencePrognosisTime FactorsColorectal cancerDiabetesMetabolic syndromeObesityPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30701442
OpenAlexW2913784452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.