ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Assessment of aortic valve tract dynamics using automatic tracking of 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease with Cardiac Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Accuracy of aortic annulus measurements by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and predictive value for thoracic aorta aneurysm in patients with aortic regurgitation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- The myth of aortic valve annulus changes in aortic valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- [Anythink for CT-based aorta root measurements before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: measurement consistency with 3mensio and impact on short-term prognosis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: detection, functional evaluation, and disease diagnosis.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2021Review
- Aortic Annular Sizing Using Novel Software in Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography in candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology is paramount for planning transcatheter AV implantation (TAVI). Nowadays, pre-TAVI sizing is routinely performed at one cardiac phase only, usually at mid-systole. Nonetheless, the AV is a dynamic structure that undergoes changes in size and shape throughout the cardiac cycle, which may be relevant for prosthesis selection. Thus, the aim of this study was to present and evaluate a novel software tool enabling the automatic sizing of the AV dynamically in three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images. Forty-two patients who underwent preoperative 3D-TEE images were retrospectively analyzed using the software. Dynamic measurements were automatically extracted at four levels, including the aortic annulus. These measures were used to assess the software's ability to accurately and reproducibly quantify the conformational changes of the aortic root and were validated against automated sizing measurements independently extracted at distinct time points. The software extracted physiological dynamic measurements in less than 2 min, that were shown to be accurate (error 2.2 ± 26.3 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
30701439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.